Welcome to PatsFans.com

If Dorsey Fell Into Our lap ... Would You ... and Trade Seymour?

Discussion in 'Patriots Draft Talk' started by IcyPatriot, Feb 27, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    37,707
    Likes Received:
    258
    Ratings:
    +477 / 2 / -10

    #87 Jersey

    If dorsey slid down to #7 and Ryan, the Longs and McFadden are all gone I would say nobody would offer much to move to #7 and Belichick would take Dorsey.

    So now you have Dorsey and Wilfork on the same team and you now consider being more of a 4-3 team. All this hypothetical because here comes the real question...

    Would you immediately try to trade Seymour to grab one of the DE's left in the draft and i would assume you get more than a #1 for him also. I have always said Seymour is a DT ... others say this also ... so really who wants 3 DT's on a 4 man line.

    Anyways .. would you grab Dorsey and try to trade Seymour asap before the 1st round is over? Keep Seymour if round 1 finishes with no takers.
  2. PonyExpress

    PonyExpress Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,658
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    There is no way I draft Dorsey. He has no position in this defense.
  3. ice

    ice Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    don't know his signing bonus of the top of my head but it is huge and would be a big hit next year.
  4. mcsully

    mcsully Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +4 / 3 / -0

    Dorsey and Ellis are built for the 4-3.. THis is why neither will get consideration from us or the dolphins..
  5. jcdavey

    jcdavey Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,669
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    no one is going to give you a 1st round pick for seymour

    he's had injury problems , he's simply not worth a #1 at this stage in his career

    aka you're overvaluing him
  6. pats63

    pats63 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    891
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    pick the de/olb from ohio state???????
  7. jeffbiologist

    jeffbiologist Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    If Dorsey ends up in our lap we will draft him. MY guess is that BB has talked with Vince about an extension this week. If he didnt want one with the possibility of the upcoming capless years....bye bye Vince. He is still on his rookie contract,easy to trade. Now we wont get anything HUGE for him, it would be like renting a player for a year and no one will give up a hi 1 for him, but it might be alot like a 2 for 1, getting Dorsey and another guy(say a cb)signed long term instead of a lesser valued player and having to pay Vince HUGE $$ next year. DONT TRADE SEYMOUR, both Ellis and Dorsey can play the nose.
  8. A.C Vegas

    A.C Vegas Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    they are not going to trade him period they are goingto trade the pick to a tea that wants a DT. an d as for the lack of a cap year it'll never never never happen it's just the owners blustering trying to set it up so they can get a better deal when the time comes
  9. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,451
    Likes Received:
    287
    Ratings:
    +738 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    I'm confused......

    When healthy, Seymour is as good a defensive lineman as there is in the league. Now, granted he's had injury problems the past 2 years, but so has Dorsey. So, why trade a pro bowl player with years of his prime still left for a guy who doesn't project to be a 3-4 DL? That's essentially what your idea comes down to.
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2008
  10. cstjohn17

    cstjohn17 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    5,027
    Likes Received:
    20
    Ratings:
    +33 / 11 / -4

    #54 Jersey

    Seymour came on strong at the end of the year and played very well during the playoffs. I was not thrilled with his production the last two year but now kind of look at it as:
    2006 writeoff - injury plagued
    2007 focus on the playoffs - treated him with kid gloves so he would be 100% for the playoffs, I don't think he was 100% but he did play very well in the playoffs

    Who knows, maybe this makes him cheaper and we have a better chance at keeping him beyond 2009. He is a rare player, at a premium position in the Pats defense.
  11. Patsmaniac

    Patsmaniac Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    No way do we trade Seymour on the hope that dorsey would make it big. BB would not throw out the depth/experience just for a rookie. if anything he would keep seymour and see how he does, etc. Possible trade after a year or two. THese threads seem to make it appear that Seymour sucks. My god,. He does not. AS for trading Big Vince? Comeon. The guy is a rare find. Anyteam in the league running a 3-4 would give us a first rounder for him in flash. He is an absolute stud dlineman. BB would pay him what it takes to keep him.
  12. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    37,707
    Likes Received:
    258
    Ratings:
    +477 / 2 / -10

    #87 Jersey

    I don't think Seymour will play to the end of his possbile career. He is supposedly very family orientated and hates being away from the family. he has hinted about retiring early in the past. I think he packs it in before he runs out of gas ... like within 3 or 4 years.
    That's what I was thinking when I made the thread.
  13. Seneschal2

    Seneschal2 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,221
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    NO.......! :)
  14. Jimke

    Jimke Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    If the Pats traded Seymour, they would have a 6 million dollar salary cap

    hit in both 2008 and 2009.
  15. Ochmed Jones

    Ochmed Jones Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +14 / 2 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    I do not know the extent of Seymour's injury, but I have a feeling that Seymour will never be the same player was was 3-4 years ago again. What he will become is an average 3-4 DE who excels against the run.

    Of the two DT's, I think Ellis could play NT in a 3-4 defense, if he got a little bigger. He gets low at the snap and stays low and is very difficult to root out of his hole.
  16. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,347
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +46 / 1 / -4

    No.

    10 characters.
  17. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,376
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ratings:
    +99 / 2 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    I haven't liked the scouting reports on Dorsey. Add in the injury, and I'd just as soon let someone else take him.
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2008
  18. dryheat44

    dryheat44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,369
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +78 / 2 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    No, but if Erin Andrews fell into my lap, I might.
  19. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,061
    Likes Received:
    132
    Ratings:
    +207 / 16 / -38

    #50 Jersey

    No. Absolutely not. First, The cap hit from trading Seymour makes its unfeasible. He still has 12 million is signing bonus pro-ration. Seymour only counts 6.84 million against the cap. You'd eat up anohter 5.16 million by trading him.

    Next, the entirety of the Pats defensive front 7 is designed for the 3-4. Changing to the 4-3 creates more problems than it fixes. The Pats have no 4-3 Defensive ends except maybe Green. So, you'd have to move at least one of Thomas or Vrabel there. But then you have holes at OLB. Bruschi doesn't have the sideline to sideline speed needed to play the MLB position. So, you also have a hole at MLB. You also have absolutely no depth.
  20. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,061
    Likes Received:
    132
    Ratings:
    +207 / 16 / -38

    #50 Jersey

    Actually, I think you are full of it. I'd be willing to bet the Pats could get a 1st rounder for Seymour. But that isn't the issue. The bigger issue is the extra 5.16 million cap hit that the Pats would take by trading Seymour.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>