Welcome to PatsFans.com

Idle thoughts....its my party and I'll rant if I want to....

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by patfanken, Jan 26, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. patfanken

    patfanken On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,762
    Likes Received:
    326
    Ratings:
    +571 / 16 / -8

    #91 Jersey

    Sorry about the obscure reference to a rock song from the early 60's, but try as I might, I'm getting ticked off with the so called “experts” early analysis of this game. We may be the early favorites according to Vegas, but that just a factor of money. The expert analysis is clearly leaning toward the Giants.

    Now the fact that the mediots seem to favor the Giants doesn't piss me off. Why would it? First off, no likes being the underdog more than I. And second, I know that you can make a very compelling case for the Giants to win this game. The fact that they are favoring them doesn't bother me in the least. What is aggravating me no end is the gross inaccuracies and faulty logic that they are using in making their predictions. Here are just a few “for examples”

    MEDIA - The Giants get the edge because Brady is coming off a bad game, while Eli is on a 5 game hot streak

    REALITY – No one is doubting that Eli is a having his best year as a pro, and is quickly coming out of his brother's shadow, However I find incomprehensible that these guys seem to ignore that Eli is coming off a game were he BARELY completed 50% of his passes, while in an admitted poor game Brady managed to complete 61%

    MEDIA – Brady is coming off a game where he threw 2 picks and had 2 more which were called back because of penalties. While Eli put up over 60 passes without a pick

    REALITY - While they weren't great throws, both of Brady's picks were absolutely fantastic plays by the Ravens. 9 times out of 10 NEITHER of those balls end up being caught. And as to the 2 that were called back, one was ball that bounced off of Welker's chest, a perfect pass, and a legit flag. The other was a heave, when Brady knew he had a free play.

    But here's what I don't understand what the media ignores. In the NFCCG Eli had one throw that was just flat out dropped, and TWO that were in the hands of the defender, only to knocked out by their own man. If he didn't have his brother's horseshoe up his ass, Eli easily could have had 3 picks. Yet somehow it never gets mentioned or even considered in the comparison

    MEDIA – The biggest advantage for the Giants is the pressure they will surely bring from their defensive front 4 -

    REALITY- This completely ignores that fact that the Pats have one of the best OL's in the league. They ignore that they have 2 first team all pros on the the line, and another guy who should be. They ignore that the Pats put up fantastic numbers on offense against some of the best pass rush teams in the league.

    And while they are over hyping the Giants DL, and underestimating the Pats OL , they are completely ignoring some serious issues about the Giants OL. Why aren't they being questioned. The Pats gave up one sack in the AFCCG, against the 3rd best rushing attack in the league, while the Giants OL gave up SEVEN (plus an amazing 20 QB hits).against the 7th best.

    Well I know a Borges-like media puke would respond that “Dah. you can't compare the Pats DL with that of the Giants DL”.:rolleyes: Well I say at least in the playoffs, you CAN.. You might find it interesting to know that in 3 games the Giants “all world”, “unstoppable” DL have accumulated 9 sacks, while in just TWO games, the “4 guys who just happen to rush for the Pats”, have accumulated 8. In total D the Giants have allowed JUST 4 yds less per game than the Pats.

    There is no question that the Giants have a very good pass rush, but I'll take my chances going up against that pass rush with OUR OL, which did a good job against one of the best pass rushing teams in the league versus a Giants OL that got Eli beaten up worse than a …...than a.....its hard to finish this simile without possibly offending SOMEBODY, so feel free to complete the thought yourselves, because I know you get the idea. ;)

    Why do the experts question an OL that has gone up against 6 of the top 10 sacking teams (Eagles, Ravens, Giants, Cowboys, Miami (twice) and Denver (twice) and only allowed 13 sacks in those 8 games. That they scored over 30 points in 6 of the 8 games, and lost only one.

    The Point is that the Pats have PLAYED 8 games against the best pass rushers in the league and have allowed LESS than 2 sacks per game. (in fact it would have even been better without the 4 sacks the Dolphins got in week 16 when BOTH Light and Mankins were late scratches)

    Again, I'm not just being another Pats homer, I'm just wondering why these paragons of football knowledge are simply ignoring facts that are readily available to them. The real facts are that these are two teams that had pretty horrible defenses (the Pats finished 31st and the Giants 29th ) that got both healthier and better at the end of the season, and into the playoffs. Like I said, if you look at their playoff stats they are remarkable similar. In total yds a mere 4ypg separate them. In points just 2 ppg. In sacks, just 1 sack/game

    Just for credibility's sake, I wouldn't mind if they said the Giants defense was better because they have had to beat the 1st, 10th, and 26th best offenses in the league(total yds), while the Pats went against the 15th an 23rd best. THAT is a legitimate point to defend that position, not the crap misinformation they are giving out. And there are others as well. Certainly enough that if I get bored enough waiting for this game to finally come about, I might to a “case for a Giants win” thread., but with legitimate and logical points. NOT the stuff I'm hearing so far from these so called experts. Maybe they are saving their best stuff for next week. At any rate, to paraphrase BB, my plea is that they “DO THEIR HOMEWORK” before putting their collective feet in Rex Ryan's mouth. ;)

    …..I'll close on a more positive note: Could this week be ANY worse for the Jets and their fans. AND while I take pleasure in the agony their FO and players must be going through (except for Santonio, of course, because we all know that he doesn't give a sh!t. ;) ); I can't help but feel a “little” compassion for their fan base, who might be watch their window of opportunity close for ANOTHER 40 years. :D
  2. Jared

    Jared Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2008
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    Hug it out bro.
  3. BradyManny

    BradyManny Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    9,771
    Likes Received:
    31
    Ratings:
    +83 / 4 / -0

    Awesome post. I really have nothing to add, very well put stuff!
  4. PlainOldEd

    PlainOldEd Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Rented mule? :deadhorse:
  5. Patriot_in_NY

    Patriot_in_NY Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,538
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +27 / 0 / -0

    As usual.... Awesome stuff.

    I actually started a similar thread (yours articulates the point better). It's almost like the media is making it seem that we some how BACKED into this game and we don't deserve to be there, and following the logic down...... have no shot at winning.

    I personally think that from a straight up "football" perspective, of all the NFC teams that made the playoff's, only Atlanta would have been a more favorable opponent.

    Giants are very good, are certainly red hot and could easily win this game......... But it's not like they were at the "top" of many statistical categories in the regular season. We all did want to face them, but that because of the history and we're biased in that way....... but bottom line, this Giants team is not super scary from an statistical football sort of way. The best thing that have going for it is that have the proven mental toughness to win this game..... which coincidently you can make the same argument for the Patriots.

    You'd NEVER know that from the media though. It's like 2007 all over, cept this time, the Patriots don't have a chance against the "vaunted" New York Football Giants :confused:

    It's all good though. I hated the position we were in back in 2007 and it never was a comfortable feel for me going into that game the way we did (so heavily favored). This is a perfect set up for a huge win for us.
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2012
  6. borg

    borg Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,908
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +150 / 8 / -13

    The Giants handled the Patriots in Foxborough!!.....Why shouldn't the experts believe in the Giants again?
  7. Patriot_in_NY

    Patriot_in_NY Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,538
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +27 / 0 / -0

    I think the point is, the Giants hype goes WAY BEYOND just believing the Giants will win. It's reaching Patriots can't win at some levels (BSPN for instance).
  8. patsfaninpittsburgh

    patsfaninpittsburgh Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,055
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    ken

    This happens because you look at facts and draw conclusions.

    The other guys have a conclusion then torture 'facts" to support their conclusion.

    Look at our village idiots. Has being proven wrong left them any less embolden?

    Not really.
  9. Haley

    Haley Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,189
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +52 / 1 / -0

    Additionally I would argue that the 2 that were brought back never would have been attempted if the flag had not been thrown prior to the attempts. Those were "freebies" as I remember things. Correct me if I'm wrong here.
  10. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    30,061
    Likes Received:
    330
    Ratings:
    +838 / 5 / -3

    I love how the media even the local media are saying in the playoffs that Eli is the better QB. Based on one game. Brady against the Broncos could have easily put up 500 yards and 8 TDs if they didn't take the foot off the gas. Brady has a bad game which wasn't nearly as bad as people make it out to be and now Eli is the better QB? I think it is hilarious.

    Yes, Brady is going up against the better defense in the Super Bowl, but I would take Brady over Manning anyday including a week from this Sunday.
  11. Ron Sellers

    Ron Sellers Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Didn't we just go through the same exact exercise a week ago with all those that proclaimed the Ravens were going to win, because they beat the Patriots in the playoffs two years ago?

    My first inclination was that you're being sarcastic, but based on the majority of your comments this season I'm going to assume that not only are you serious, but you agree with them.

    So the logic is if Team A beats Team B the first time they meet, then they should do the same again, correct?

    Did you feel the Bills should have been favored to beat the Pats in December because Buffalo won in September also?

    Consider this: how has Bill Belichick and his coaching staff done facing a team for the second time, after losing the first time around, since Tom Brady became the starting quarterback? A grand total of only two such losses in eleven years.

    Can the Giants win? Of course they can; they are a good team playing at a high level right now. But logic like 'they won last time, therefore they are going to win this time' is just as superficial and flawed as the reasons why Denver was going to win (Broncos were moving the ball and would have won if it wasn't for the turnovers - while disregarding the adjustments the Pats made on defense and not crediting them with the forced turnovers) or why Baltimore was going to win (the equally meaningless and inconsequential stat about the two teams records versus teams that finished the season with a winning record.)
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2012
  12. Theplayer

    Theplayer Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    It's not if Eli is better than Brady, it's who has the better match up..Eli vs the Pats defense or Brady vs the Giants. It's not far fetched to think that Eli could have a better game. Brady's recent track record in the play-offs against very good pass rushing defenses is not that great.

    I don't agree with the people who say that Brady can't have 2 bad games in a row. It''s all about the defense he's facing.
  13. RelocatedPatFan

    RelocatedPatFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,328
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +36 / 1 / -0

    Presumption of FACTS by the media.
    1. Eli was an ok QB in 2007, now Eli is eliteand maybe he's surpasses Brady
    2. Patriots defense is almost a historically worst ever
    3. The Giants defense is as good as it was in 2007
    4. The Patriots offense is an even scratch from 2007 (no improvement, not worse)
    5. Because the Giants beat them in Foxborough, the Giants will have the aadvantage on a neutral field
    6. Giants are much improved since that game because they got Key Playmakers back. Patriots are the same team it seems (though we know they aren't)
    7. Patriots have a losing record to Tom Coughlin and will continue to lose
    did I miss many. Maybe I'll follow up with some of the reasons we can win, but duty calls.
  14. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,136
    Likes Received:
    523
    Ratings:
    +1,441 / 26 / -47

    No Jersey Selected

    I suppose I'm one of those "village idiots" you're talking about. I haven't really been proven wrong yet. If anything, my analysis about the defense throughout the season was proven right when Belichick was still tinkering with the line-up in the last week of the regular season against the Bills (McCourty to safety, Moore to CB) plus re-inserting the 3-4. He saw there was problems with the personnel that he had and has done his damndest to fix them. So far, it has worked.
  15. E1Downey

    E1Downey Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Rob I LOVE this too and not in the sarcastic kind of way hehe. I want them to keep singing this ridiculous song all the way to kickoff on Feb 5th. I want them to sing it as loud and as often as they possibly can!

    I want this because, I think it pisses Brady off more than we could ever know. I am one of the many who think that the Tebow hype actually did drive TFB crazy and that it "Lit a fire" so to speak.

    So hopefully they keep up with this bologna, and it really pisses Brady off and then he shreds that NYG defense to shreds! I hope they dominate this game! I hope they go up early and NEVER let up.

    Pedal to the metal until that final whistle is blown, even if they are fortunate enough to be up by 35 points! That is my superbowl fantasy lol
  16. E1Downey

    E1Downey Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I may be wrong but, I think one of the reasons for some of the late tinkering on D may have been due to losing Carter in Week 15.
  17. BadMoFo

    BadMoFo Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,763
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +11 / 0 / -0

    One thing's for sure, whoever wins this one will be saying, "no one thought we could do this. No one gave us a chance."

    hate that.
  18. borg

    borg Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,908
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +150 / 8 / -13

    Love the homer outrage. And which part of what I wrote is the sarcastic part.....Am I not allowed to understand why the experts might like the GMen better?

    Maybe the "experts" watched the Pats/Giants game two months ago and saw the Giants pressure Brady and abuse the Pats DBs.

    Maybe the experts saw the Giants snap the Pats multi year home winning streak...then realize the SB is in a neutral site without that Pats home advantage.

    And are you comparing the 2nd Bills game, vs a team that had lost 8 out 9 going into the Pats game, with this Giants SB against a team that has one 5 in a row, beating the best D and 2nd best O on this run.

    Yeah ....how dare the experts believe in the Giants....bunch of clowns they are!! Frankly, I'm surprised the Pats are favored at all. The Giants possess 2 strengths that the Pats are vulnerable against....a pass rush and an accurate passer. And it seems funny to dismiss the 2007 game....sure most of the players are new, but the coach is the same coach that has devised schemes to beat the Pats.
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2012
  19. patfanken

    patfanken On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,762
    Likes Received:
    326
    Ratings:
    +571 / 16 / -8

    #91 Jersey

    "Handled" Borgy? Are you sh!tting me. At first I thought you were being sarcastic, but I guess being viewed as the village contrarian is more important that intellectual integrity. "Handled"? :rolleyes:

    Did you forget the fact that the Pats had close to a 100 more passing yds, DESPITE turning the ball over 4 times. "Handled"?

    Did you forget that the "almighty" Giant defense allowed the Pats over 450 yds of offense, again, despite the 4 turnovers "Handled"

    Did you forget that "unstoppable" Giants pass rush managed hold Brady to "only" 342 yds. "Handled"?

    Did you forget that the Giants scored MOST of its points AFTER the Pats lost BOTH their starting safeties mid game, and Spikes as well. "Handled"?

    Did you forget that on BOTH of the Giants last 2 scoring drives were helped by 2 key PI calls, one of which was very questionable, the other a horrid play by Sergio Brown on a ball that was never going to be caught. - Gifts "Handled"?

    Now I'm not saying that the Giants didn't deserve to win that game - To paraphrase BB, "they made more plays that we did". BUT, Borg......HANDLED?. Hardly, not even close. That game was close fought, tight game, won by the team that made more plays on THAT particular day. Nothing is likely to change a week from Sunday.

    HANDLED? :roleyes:
  20. patfanken

    patfanken On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,762
    Likes Received:
    326
    Ratings:
    +571 / 16 / -8

    #91 Jersey

    Do your Homework, Borg! How can you call allowing 250 yds of passing offense against a team that lost their 2 starting safeties "abuse" :rolleyes:

    The 2007 game is irrelevant,. and you know it. :rolleyes:
    Now that is a legitimate point. You should have used this in the first place rather than the drivel you've espoused to this point.

    Well here we agree. I was surprised too, especially given the media's current spin. Lets see who is the "underdog" by the KO time, Not that it will matter. Even at -2.5, its essentially an even game

    Accurate passer.? Are talking about the guy who was a career 58% passer before this season, and in his best year is merely at 61% passer or the guy who had a 52% completion rate in his LAST game. :rolleyes: And that “unstoppable pass rush”. Is that the one which has only one more sack in 3 games than the "pathetic" one the Pats have. :rolleyes: Again Borg, Do your homework
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2012
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>