Welcome to PatsFans.com

I propose a new rule..

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by ELOrocks17, Jul 13, 2006.

  1. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    From now on lets agree that links from the following websites are NOT considered reliable and therfore cannot be used to support an argument.
    Here is the list:

    LIBERAL SITES:
    Democratic underground
    ACLU
    Moveon.org
    Mediamatters
    CNN
    NY Times
    LA Times
    any San Francisco newspaper
    Ed Shultz


    CONSERVATIVE SITES:
    Newsmax.com
    Drudge
    AnnCoulter.com





    Can we agree to this?
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 18, 2005
  2. Pujo

    Pujo Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Messages:
    6,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    I'll leave it to someone else to question the fairness of you listing three conservative sites and 9 liberal sites (one of which is "any San Fransisco newspaper"), I'll just point out that these sites may or may not be 100% reliable, depending on what you're researching. If you want to see if the ACLU files a suit against somebody, a press release announcing the litigation on their site is close to primary evidence. The crazy thing is people treating any editorials & opinions as news, whether they come from Ann Coulter, the New York Times, or somebody's crazy uncle.
  3. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Have you disproved the rumsfeld photo yet, do a search and post the facts.
    Until then that the only one who is biased is one who doesn't research the issue to make sure it's legit or not legit.
    And that list should include the whitehouse press release to every media outlet on the planet.
  4. 363839

    363839 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I think you could add The Wall Street Journal and I don't know how about
    Readers Digest?
  5. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,421
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +265 / 10 / -26

    Hate to say this, but seems you begged the right wing side, how about adding:

    Rush Limbaugh
    Bill O'Reilly
    Savage
    Hannity

    I am not sure I agree with this rule, need to sleep on it though.
  6. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    38,770
    Likes Received:
    415
    Ratings:
    +881 / 6 / -16

    #87 Jersey

    No:

    Even the political sites sometimes have accurate information.

    Other times...they give you ideas for finding the correct information.

    Lastly...they give you an opposite point of view that can help make you look furthur.
  7. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    The only problem is, NEM uses all those liberal sites for links and no one calls him on it, yet when i post something from Newsmax..everyone complains that its biased. What gives?
  8. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13


    Sometimes people call Blue Collar for the mediamatters links. The left may be more sensitive to opposing POV's.
  9. PatsFanInEaglesLand

    PatsFanInEaglesLand Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Ratings:
    +91 / 7 / -13

    #37 Jersey

    Bullsh!t, if they don't like a person's opinion they trash them, thats it!

    They also use other left wing sites as reference, what a joke.

    It is also run by a compulsive liar.
  10. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13

    Many of the clip I have vbiewed were taken out of context and deceptive.. Whne I gone to other sites to get complete transcripts it made the media matters stuff look like a political ad. Coming from the people who involved this isn't unexpected.
  11. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    So the clip where oreilly apologizes for smearing murtha is deceptive?
  12. PatsFanInEaglesLand

    PatsFanInEaglesLand Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Ratings:
    +91 / 7 / -13

    #37 Jersey

    Where is the speech?
  13. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I don't know. the story was retracted and oreilly mea culpaed.
    I'm taking it, that you're still believing this latest smear campaign even though there is a retraction and an apology admitted by oreilly?
  14. PatsFanInEaglesLand

    PatsFanInEaglesLand Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Ratings:
    +91 / 7 / -13

    #37 Jersey

    Oh I see everything else needs documented facts, except this one.
  15. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Maybe you can do a search and prove that murtha did in fact say it. Then call fox news and they can retract the mea culpa, I'm sure they would love to.
  16. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    9 sites vs 3. He he he.

    Anyone who trusts any site out there without multiple independent sources is a dingleberry.

    I'd like to propose a rule about starting dumb threads, but that would go against my philosophy of letting people figure things out for themselves.
  17. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,421
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +265 / 10 / -26

    I think a more responsible way of doing this, not sure if I agree yet or not, is to use any of the sites to google to a more credible source. i.e. NEWSMAX reports that Hillary wears boxer shorts, find out from another source if she really does or not or if this is just a figment of the imagination. Too often I see posters post something preposterous, only to be validated by an obscure right or left wing web site.
  18. PatsFanInVa

    PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    20,376
    Likes Received:
    252
    Ratings:
    +437 / 6 / -9

    Fox in general is pretty obviously less reliable and has less integrity than, for example, the NYT. The fact that the list is so biased makes for a comical statement in itself.

    Good concept, if the devil weren't in the application... and another good reminder how important the freedom so sort through the crap oneself is.

    PFnV
  19. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13

    That isn't obivious at all to many. The ratings say that Fox is by far a preferred media source. They haven't had anything comprable to Jason Blair for example.

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
  20. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,830
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +543 / 2 / -9

    Dan Rather

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>