I wish we had traded Deion for a #2, maybe we would have used it.
Say what? No offence there dude but this is among the most dumb-ass comments I've ever seen on this board.
Last edited:
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I wish we had traded Deion for a #2, maybe we would have used it.
Why not? Were you expecting NO's to be there last year? They were picking #2 last year. SF was picking #11 this year.
It's the NFC -- anything can happen.
Say what you want, but the simple fact is other teams are more improved RIGHT NOW than NE. That is what matters for 2007. 2008 could be another story, but I'd rather focus on winning the 2007 SB than the 2008 SB.
Well said!What I think is so funny is that most people knew they would likely trade back in 28 and aquiring future pick(s) (and suggested it) yet when it happens people still start freaking out like it's some horrible event.
(A) That may just be one of the most ignorant statements I've read all day.
(B) A close second.
(C) Great. Even more short-sighted than before. Let's get a pick now instead of later, because that player will help us now. Let's neglect the future. Fantastic.
(D) Finally some sense.
Better he wastes the pick on another T. Banta-Cain so Draftnicks can be happy.
What I think is so funny is that most people knew they would likely trade back in 28 and aquiring future pick(s) (and suggested it) yet when it happens people still start freaking out like it's some horrible event.
I endorsed the move and still got killed by the moderator!
(A) - I think Branch would have contributed to a Super Bowl last year. The team lost its best receiver and still was only 1 minute away from making the Super Bowl. He could have made that first down! Disagree? Fine! Call me ignorant for that belief: ridiculous.
(B) - The Pats are the best team in the league next year without injuryies. Are you arguing that? Thats how I read that.
(C) - Mike Ditka traded away the future for Ricky Williams. Dont think having a 24 year old in 2008 instead of a 23 year old is really selling away the future.
(D) Again, if BB/SP didn't like the men on the board, the trade is endorsed by me.
I am fine with transferring value to 2008. I think that's a smart move, given the overall crappiness of this draft and the fact that the Pats won't be getting any comp picks next year. The think that made my eyes pop out is the #!%& 4th-round compensation this year. You're trading a 1st away to the future, a second-day pick is sorry compensation.
I am fine with transferring value to 2008. I think that's a smart move, given the overall crappiness of this draft and the fact that the Pats won't be getting any comp picks next year. The think that made my eyes pop out is the #!%& 4th-round compensation this year. You're trading a 1st away to the future, a second-day pick is sorry compensation.