- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 16,342
- Reaction score
- 7,623
Funny way of reading those stats? Really? They're very straightforward. I sifted through his stats and used this calculator (NFL, NCAA, AFL - Quarterback Rating Calculator). Here's his career #'s:
1st-3rd Q: 64.6%, 7.6 ypa, 51.1 att/int, 97.6 rating
4th Q: 61.5%, 7.1 ypa, 36.4 att/int, 91.9 rating
He's worse in completion percentage, yards per attempt, attempt/interception ratio, and QB rating.
In other words, for his career, he's worse in the 4th quarter than he is in the first three. Not every game, obviously, but pretty consistently year-to-year, from the beginning of his career to the present, and, of course, when all his numbers are totaled up.
Doesn't mean I don't want him to have the ball with the game on the line, and it doesn't mean he's not an all-time great (I'd rather have him than anyone else), but he's not bullet-proof.
Thanks for the data and for doing the work associated with gathering it.
I know it's a bit much for someone who didn't do the work to ask a question like this, but the statistician in me would be interested in the Standard Deviations around those indicators, as they would help us determine the materiality of the differences between Quarters One to Three and Quarter Four performance.
On the surface, a difference of a half a yard per Attempt and three out of a hundred completions doesn't seem material and could be random, though the pick frequency is around 30% higher and probably noteworthy.