Welcome to PatsFans.com

Harry Reid: American troops dying to protect George Bush's Legacy

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by mikey, Apr 20, 2007.

  1. mikey

    mikey Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

  2. 3 to be 4

    3 to be 4 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

  3. mikey

    mikey Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0



    Just how many American and Iraqi lives is worth George Bush's legacy?




    .
  4. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    One can't deny that LBJ blew it with Vietnam. Comparing Bush to LBJ is unfair however, LBJ Didn't have the experience of Vietnam to guide his decision making. Bush did.
  5. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    20 times more American soldiers died in Vietnam (thank you JFK and LBJ) but if you believe the American liberal, Iraq is the all time greatest debacle in the history of our Republic. Yeah. Right. Sure. :rolleyes:
  6. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,199
    Likes Received:
    129
    Ratings:
    +361 / 1 / -9

    Reid Is Afraid A Victory In Iraq Might Be Declared

    Reid Wants America To Lose

    Reid Is A Sniveling Skinny Little Weasle Traitor Rat Bastard Jealous And Filled With Hate

    F-ck Harry Reid
    :bricks:
  7. mikey

    mikey Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0


    There is NO VICTORY in Iraq because it is a CIVIL WAR.

    American soldiers are just killing innocent SUNNIS and not the terrorists. (The terrorists are in Pakistan and Afghanistan)


    .
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2007
  8. mr3putt

    mr3putt Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,525
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Different tactics of prosecuting the war QUI.

    We were in Vietnam for a longer period....with over 500,000 boots on the ground at once. Today's technologies provide standoff engagements better than those of the 60's. What is so incredibly stupid is the administrations insistence on putting soldiers on street corners as stationary targets for the jerkoffs. In fact the casualty rates currently seen in Iraq are extremely troubling to those agencies reponsible for medical and post-injury rehabilitation. The death toll is bad...the injury rates sustained are horrendous.

    I am even more cynical regarding Georges motives for the "Surge"
    He is simply insuring that this mess continues beyond his Presidency to force the newly elected Democrats to deal with the withdrawal. He and his advisers already know this turkey is cooked. Our men and women bleed for political expediancy. Nothing more.

    This in keeping with his complete lack of genuine concern or compassion for those who give their lives every day for his failures. He is criminally responsible.
  9. 3 to be 4

    3 to be 4 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    ZERO. the point was supposed to be to go after the nations who harbor terrorists. hmmm. Saudi Arabia? No, we cant go in there, too many friends in the oil business. Iran or N. Korea, no, they are are too much of a real threat, it might make them mad. Afganistan? well, of course, we'll do that first and then not finish the job.
    Iraq? well, we can sell that, Saddam is a bad guy, he threatened my Dad, and there are oil interests that will help the family.
    we'll tell people its just like the Gulf War, in and out, then move on to Iran or something.

    back in 2003 thats what americans thought it would be. Another Gulf War. Blast the heck out of Baghdad, maybe get Saddam in the process, then move on to the next threat.

    NOBODY expected it was about spreading democracy or any of that garbage. And nobody expected it to last 4 years ( and counting) and over 3,000 American troops lives ( and counting).

    the moment we sent in ground troops in numbers too low to make sense, and got into marching into Baghdad, it was clear this was a fiasco from the start and not about what we were told it was about.

    this isnt a conservative vs liberal issue. its not a Christianity vs secular issue.

    this is about incompetance at best and murderous deception at worst.

    and this is coming from an Evangelical Christian who knows plenty others who feel the same way. I met another Evangelical in South Carolina one day who took me through the history of that region, prophesy and the Book of Revelation. He said to me 2 years what I knew deep inside but needed to hear in Biblical terms. The Iraqis and the Arab Nations hate us. they will always hate us. They will never become a democracy. Nowhere in Scripture does it ever say or imply that a big superpower comes in democratizes the region. So OBVIOUSLY, Bush, Cheney and the Neo-Cons are NOT basing this war on their "Christianity". that was a cynical ploy to gain support from the conservative base.

    George Bush is not a "peacemaker". His White House refers to the "Evangelicals" as "The Nuts".

    this war was wrong from the start, and in the long run will cause MUCH more harm than Vietnam ever did due to the way we went in there and the lasting effects of our blunder.

    If Bush admits this, as it was basically all he did during his Presidency, he goes down as the worst President in history. So he never will do so.

    and thousands more will die.
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2007
  10. mikey

    mikey Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0



    If George Bush is sending American boys to die in Iraq for his legacy, what then is the difference between George Bush and Seung-Hui Cho?



    .
  11. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    :rofl: God, you are a brainwashed imbecile :rofl: :rofl:
  12. ArmyPatsFan

    ArmyPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2007
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Man ......I try and not get involved in threads that deal with anything outside ofthe military.....but this has got to be one of the most ignorant posts I have read yet.
  13. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,199
    Likes Received:
    129
    Ratings:
    +361 / 1 / -9

    Your dealing with a guy that is obsessed with dead people, he is in charge of Pats Fans Obituary Reports, he would have gone nuts during WWII.
    :bricks:
  14. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    That's the American liberal in action. There is no depth to which they will not sink in their irrational, obsessive hatred of Bush.
  15. mr3putt

    mr3putt Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,525
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Not true Mikey....

    Cho was a psychopath and social misfit who committed a dispicable act to call attention to his miserable existance.

    George Bush is far more dangerous than that.

    He is the worst kind of meglomaniac......
    Sure in his convictions (even in when in contradiction to the facts)
    Unwilling to comprimise or consider seriously alternative ideas and act upon them (Baker Report)
    Willing to sacrifice the integrity of his administration to preserve status quo.
    (Gonzo)
    Has his finger on the Nuclear trigger and takes his marching orders exclusively from Rove...Cheney..and God. In that order.

    Oh ...and did I mention he is as dumb as a stump!!!!!!!
  16. mr3putt

    mr3putt Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,525
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Nice insight Qui...I guess Mikey must have provoked you on another thread.

    You only escalate in the face of personnal insults directed at you.

    Yeah...right :rolleyes:
  17. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Your side brought a sitting president up on blowjob charges Quiggy. Yet you talk about irrational, obsessive hatred?
  18. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Heaven forbid we let facts get in the way, but actually he was brought up for committing a felony. The felony was not receiving a blowjob from a fat, ugly intern. Perhaps you are well informed enough to know exactly what his crime was and you were just being deliberately obtuse in your above remark. Perhaps not.
  19. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Ya know Quiggy it just occurred to me that you're really just trying to derail yet another thread that you don't like. So I'll rerail this thread with a link
    back to the original subject and a reminder that intentionally and constantly derailing threads is a bannable offense at many forums.
  20. mr3putt

    mr3putt Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,525
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Once again the last best and only retort to criticism of the Bush disaster.

    Clinton got a BJ and lied under oath.

    In one instance there is a stained dress and a soiled reputation.
    In the other 3500 dead and this country's soiled reputation .

    Yup...sounds even...:rolleyes:

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>