Discussion in 'NFL Football Forum' started by IllegalContact, Aug 4, 2011.
once the jets dump him.......
i see that as a possibility...he absolutely kills us
If his back is fine,Then i would be fine with him
Let him go somewhere like St. Louis, Seattle or Tampa.. We don't need Cotchery.. Jets are fools to let him go...
the only reason I'd see us grab Cotchery is to get a hold of the Jets playbook and pump him for some info. otherwise please see the 'do we have too many wrs' thread. the initial premise of the thread - do we need to trade welker is unbelievably flawed. but the point that we do have a good number of receivers now is true. The only locks are Ocho, Welker, and Branch. Meanwhile price, tate, and edelman will be fighting for their roster lives. can cotchery give us anything better and actually make the roster?
Ochocinco, Welker & Branch are better and Price & Edelman show a lot of promise.
Jets let go of some of these guys that prick you on the thumb and make you bleed to death. Brad Smith and Cotchery are two guys I would be glad to not see in green.
This threads making me itch!
I think the Pats are all set at WR now. If we add any bodies, please let it be defense
We already missed out on Gholston.
Lets sign every ex Jet.
In before the merge into the mega thread.
I dont understand the obsession with a) Jets cuts b)starting a new thread everytime someone is cut somewhere.
To loosely quote apple "there's a <<thread>> for that"
Grab WHAT? Eww
Grab him- love to have a player like that especially with something to prove
and also knows the jets inside out- he has some good talent yet
If we had a need at WR, then we should definitely pounce on this guy. But since we're already talking about who's going to draw the short straw of our current WR's, I don't see this as being needed.
you can grab that- maybe you like it- LOL
Wish there was room to bring him in, he'd be a strong addition
he would be on the PUP list for a while- could come of when needed to replace
an injured reciever
I'd swap Tate for him if he's healthy. As I mentioned in the other thread, BB likes players that he's had trouble stopping in the past, and Cotchery qualifies there.
Missed out on Mark Brunnel aswell
Yo dawg, we heard you like threads, so we put a thread inside yo thread!
.....and being Sanchize's boyfriend
I think most of us are too old!
You know, over 16
The title of this thread gave me instant visions of both Roseanne Barr and Michael Jackson. Weird. Threw up; better now.
Glad to see Cotchery (and B Smith) no longer Jets. But I think Pats are set at WR.
No need for him at all
Jets are fools for being Jets
So they're going with the 34 and to-be 38 year old (this January) as their #2 and #3 WR's...this receiving corps could sponsor AARP.
PFT is reporting it as done.
Jerricho Cotchery released by Jets | ProFootballTalk
Sign him and leave him on the PUP. He can be used later in season, if needed, or to replace Branch next year. He, makes big plays in big games - these guys get teams into championship games. Sign him, we'll find room somewhere, after a month or two - if not we can release him then. If he's on the PUP, he's not worth/cost much.
Can we acquire a player who goes immediately to the PUP? Wouldn't the physical be a problem for all acquiring teams?
I like the mix they have at WR right now and hope they go into the season with Welker, Branch, Johnson, Edelman, Tate, and Price. I think they set up perfectly with Edelman backing Welker, Tate backing Branch, and Price backing Johnson
Hadn't looked at it that way, but good point.
Separate names with a comma.