Welcome to PatsFans.com

Good Read from SI.com on Ridley - Behind Ridley, Pats might have rediscovered missing

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Ian, Jan 10, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ian

    Ian Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2000
    Messages:
    5,176
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +188 / 2 / -1

    #17 Jersey

  2. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    9,006
    Likes Received:
    40
    Ratings:
    +96 / 0 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Good Read from SI.com on Ridley - Behind Ridley, Pats might have rediscovered mis

    Very nice read. Thanks for the link! love the flexibility and added dimension all the Pats RBs provide, but gotta think Ridley will be the key (along with soem well-times passes to Woodhead). I believe out-rushed Foster last time, and would love if it happened again.
  3. PP2

    PP2 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,715
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +99 / 3 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    Re: Good Read from SI.com on Ridley - Behind Ridley, Pats might have rediscovered mis

    Has nothing to do with Ridley who was, in fact, here last year, and everything to do with the play calling which is much more balanced now.
  4. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,484
    Likes Received:
    245
    Ratings:
    +541 / 6 / -0

    Re: Good Read from SI.com on Ridley - Behind Ridley, Pats might have rediscovered mis

    IMO the article is kind of self-contradictory and doesn't add up. They claim that the past pass-heavy, imbalanced offense was largely a matter of philosophy, not personnel. But then how do you explain them spending a #1 pick on Laurence Maroney? And is Ridley the lynchpin, or just the guy who was in the right place at the right time? :confused:
  5. DocHoliday

    DocHoliday Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I really believe that Lo-Mo was the victim of poor schemes and stunted development/confidence due to it.

    Hard to believe that a new RB was all that's needed. At the very least some scheme change was necessary.
  6. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    17,909
    Likes Received:
    168
    Ratings:
    +354 / 6 / -8

    #75 Jersey

    Re: Good Read from SI.com on Ridley - Behind Ridley, Pats might have rediscovered mis

    Maroney wasn't used because he wasn't consistent. Ridley moves the chains and breaks big runs. Maroney didn't do the first, Ben Jarvis didn't do the second.

    You can scheme yourself to death but it won't turn a hesitant running back into a force.
  7. DocHoliday

    DocHoliday Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    He wasn't terrible early on. IMHO he was fine in 07-08, but fell apart in 09 when the passing game resurged
  8. Joey007

    Joey007 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,345
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    Re: Good Read from SI.com on Ridley - Behind Ridley, Pats might have rediscovered mis

    The guys problem was he danced around too much, while BJGE was the complete opposite, nowhere but straight forward. I agree that Ridley has fitted himself well in between those running styles.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>