Welcome to PatsFans.com

Good News For McCain (Castro)

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Harry Boy, May 26, 2008.

  1. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,213
    Likes Received:
    129
    Ratings:
    +362 / 1 / -9

  2. Wildo7

    Wildo7 Totally Full of It

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,851
    Likes Received:
    34
    Ratings:
    +39 / 2 / -0

    Because Obama would be better for Cuba. He'd actually talk to Castro and possibly end the embargo. You know, as in make the world a better place instead of invading other countries for oil.
  3. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,045
    Likes Received:
    112
    Ratings:
    +195 / 7 / -23

    Never understood this embargo stuff, does anyone think that Saddam, Castro or Quadaffi ever went without??, the only people that go without are the women amd children.. the only reason the embargo exists is to pander to the spanish vote in Florida.. this is a freaking joke.. remember don't talk to anyone send warships off the coast.. scare the crap out of them.
  4. PatsFanInEaglesLand

    PatsFanInEaglesLand Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    44
    Ratings:
    +88 / 7 / -11

    #37 Jersey

    Birds of a feather.................................
  5. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    In a way the embargo is a good thing...Cuba is still relatively unspoiled. Can you imagine if there was no embargo? The country would be one giant Sandals/Trump resort.

    And why do you say "Oh...the suffering of the women and children...oh the pain..."? Because every other country trades with Cuba. The condition of the country can be traced directly to the Castro family.

    That said, I've never supported the embargo either. We trade with China, traded with the Soviet Union...it's a stupid embargo.
  6. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,213
    Likes Received:
    129
    Ratings:
    +362 / 1 / -9

    Castro tortures, Castro kills, Castro Confines AIDS carriers to sanatoriums and Cuba is a f-cking Dump.

    American Liberals who go ballistic and start throwing blood all over city hall when an American Cop slaps a Murderers face or when America wiretaps a Muslim why do these American Liberals ADORE and Worship this creepy stinking savage DICTATOR-----:confused::confused:

    I always thought American Liberals were against Cruelty and Loss Of Freedom.

    Can you just picture GW Bush trying to put all of America's AIDS Carriers in a Sanatorium-

    Jesus Watch Over Us, Save Us
  7. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,045
    Likes Received:
    112
    Ratings:
    +195 / 7 / -23


    Because Castro does not suffer or want from anything, the women and chidren are effected... if our embargo is usurped by other nations, why continue the embargo.. to pander to the spanish vote in Fla..
  8. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Okay, so work with me a minute: if Castro doesn't suffer or want for anything, but the people are suffering/struggling, and every other country trades with Cuba, wouldn't that indicate that the problem is related to Castro and his government, and not the US embargo?

    And didn't I say I thought the embargo was stupid (except for having the by-product of keeping Cuba from becoming one big Trump hotel, casino and parking lot?

    And yes, it's partly (maybe mostly, I don't know) to pander to the Cubans in FL.
    And because it's some kind of habit, I guess. I don't know anyone personally who thinks it's a good idea. Do you?
  9. cupofjoe1962

    cupofjoe1962 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,558
    Likes Received:
    18
    Ratings:
    +33 / 12 / -2

    Oil?

    We got Oil ?

    I heard it costs 38 cents a gallon for gas in Iraq and I paid 3.83 a gallon
    yesterday.
  10. Wildo7

    Wildo7 Totally Full of It

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,851
    Likes Received:
    34
    Ratings:
    +39 / 2 / -0

    Maybe you should talk to the oil execs raking in record profits. Or perhaps the nice folks at PNAC who designed the Iraq invasion for critical leverage. Or you could just keep dumbing it down to the "price at the pump" argument like the Bush administration wants you to.
  11. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,421
    Likes Received:
    148
    Ratings:
    +304 / 9 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    The state of CA "makes" 5 times as much per gallon as the oil companies do. As you have been told over and over, oil companies make very little per gallon, no more than before, the record profits come from record consumption. I pay about 8 cents per gallon in profit to the oil companies but 40 cents or so to CA + more to the feds.
  12. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,769
    Likes Received:
    132
    Ratings:
    +169 / 4 / -4

    It's no surprise that Castro would prefer Obama to McCain. In fact, I would think most of the civilized world would prefer Obama to McCain. In fact, anyone who opposes war, even if their motives are selfish, would probably prefer Obama to McCain. Who is more likely to attack Cuba? Obama or McCain?
  13. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,421
    Likes Received:
    148
    Ratings:
    +304 / 9 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    What most of the world wants isn't that important; hint : that's why we don't let them vote.
  14. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,045
    Likes Received:
    112
    Ratings:
    +195 / 7 / -23


    INteresting, do you have a source or are we just supposed to believe what you say???
  15. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    So McC is going to attack Cuba? I know his idol is Teddy Roosevelt, but isn't that taking it a bit far?
  16. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,421
    Likes Received:
    148
    Ratings:
    +304 / 9 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    This is a little old :

    http://www.jb-williams.com/4-25-06.htm

    but it's the best I could find. Although prices have gone up considerably since then, obviously the cost of the raw product has too.

    Anyway :

    "Based upon a $3.00 gallon of gasoline, the average break-down is as follows.

    Gasoline Retailer $.01 cents per gallon
    Oil Company $.08 cents per gallon
    Refining $.29 cents per gallon
    Marketing/Distribution $.32 cents per gallon
    Taxes $.59 cents per gallon
    Cost of crude $1.71 per gallon (delivered)"


    This matches what I said which is what I've heard in numerous places on TV news, etc. Heck, in CA, there is a Gas Tax Tax, yes, we are taxed 8% of the Federal tax on gas.
  17. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,045
    Likes Received:
    112
    Ratings:
    +195 / 7 / -23

    Seen something quite different last week there was an article that I read discussing the profit margins of oil companies, that article indicated the profit margin was between 7% and 11%.. however cannot find that source.. here is one link that says Oil Companies are now about 7.6% which equates in California to about $.38 per gallon.. so your numbers are somewhat off..

    http://www.usnews.com/articles/busi...xons-profits-measuring-a-record-windfall.html

  18. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,769
    Likes Received:
    132
    Ratings:
    +169 / 4 / -4

    I didn't say that, I merely asked who is more likely. If you're Castro, chances are you worry more about McCain than Obama, don't you think?
  19. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,213
    Likes Received:
    129
    Ratings:
    +362 / 1 / -9

    Of course Obama would be better for Cuba and he'd be better for everybody else all over this world that "Hates Us".

    :bricks:
    Last edited: May 27, 2008
  20. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,045
    Likes Received:
    112
    Ratings:
    +195 / 7 / -23

    Another issue is that China has permission from Cuba to drill for oil off of its coast...

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>