Wilfork#75
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2010
- Messages
- 2,348
- Reaction score
- 859
I understand not wanting to trade Mallett because of the hole it would leave at backup QB, but would the backup need to run the exact same system as TB12? Couldn't we have a backup with a dulled down playbook with some similar concepts as Brady? A lot of the backups around the league are very different to the starter on their team and have some different concepts if they are forced into action. Why couldn't the Pats have a much more simplified playbook for a backup QB that is much easier to learn and execute. Realistically we are screwed anyway if Brady goes down for an extended period of time, so we just need a guy that can come in a win a few games if necessary, not carry a team.
On whether anyone would trade a 2nd for Mallett, Houston would be the only ones that could do it because Bill O'Brien is familiar with him (unless McDaniels does end up getting the Cleveland job which I still wont rule out). What it would all come down to is how does O'Brien view Mallett, how does he view the top QB's in the draft and how does he view the top non QB (Clowney). None of the QB's in this draft are sure things and although I like Bridgewater I know there are a lot of people that have doubts about him. Bortles has huge upside but is also a huge risk and I don't see Manziel a fit for Bill O'Brien. If he isn't comfortable taking a QB #1 overall then you have to look Ryan Mallett vs the QB's in the 2nd round and beyond and I think Mallett looks quite favorable.
Personally I think taking Clowney #1 and trading #33 for Mallett would be a good idea. Obviously cap implications also have to be taken into account but when it comes to a starting QB I don't think it will be a huge issue.
Like I said earlier it will all come down to three things:
1. How does O'Brien view Mallett?
2. How does O'Brien view the QB's in the Draft?
3. How does O'Brien view Clowney?
On whether anyone would trade a 2nd for Mallett, Houston would be the only ones that could do it because Bill O'Brien is familiar with him (unless McDaniels does end up getting the Cleveland job which I still wont rule out). What it would all come down to is how does O'Brien view Mallett, how does he view the top QB's in the draft and how does he view the top non QB (Clowney). None of the QB's in this draft are sure things and although I like Bridgewater I know there are a lot of people that have doubts about him. Bortles has huge upside but is also a huge risk and I don't see Manziel a fit for Bill O'Brien. If he isn't comfortable taking a QB #1 overall then you have to look Ryan Mallett vs the QB's in the 2nd round and beyond and I think Mallett looks quite favorable.
Personally I think taking Clowney #1 and trading #33 for Mallett would be a good idea. Obviously cap implications also have to be taken into account but when it comes to a starting QB I don't think it will be a huge issue.
Like I said earlier it will all come down to three things:
1. How does O'Brien view Mallett?
2. How does O'Brien view the QB's in the Draft?
3. How does O'Brien view Clowney?