Welcome to PatsFans.com

George Bush confounds critics again -- celebrates not being the worst ever

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by mikey, Feb 16, 2009.

  1. mikey

    mikey In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    George Bush Not the Worst President Ever | dagblog.com

    .
     
  2. wistahpatsfan

    wistahpatsfan Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,675
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

  3. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    19,601
    Likes Received:
    714
    Ratings:
    +1,895 / 12 / -18

    #75 Jersey

    "According to the historians, Bush's ineffectiveness was comprehensive. He did not win the worst prize in any field of expertise but was uniformly bad across all fields, though he did place 39th in economic management, just ahead of Herbert Hoover, and 40th in international relations, narrowly losing to William Henry Harrison."
    __________________________________________________________________________

    Wasn't Harrison the dude who didn't wear a coat in sub-freezing temperatures at his Inauguration, then compounded that brilliant decision by giving the LONGEST speech in Inaugural history and (to top it off in spectacular fashion) croaked one month into his Presidency from the inevitable pneumonia he contracted?

    Bush beat out THAT Mensa Member?

    Way to go Dubya!!!!!!!!!!

    (I love the fact that the article states that he "narrowly" lost out to William Henry Harrison. That's like "narrowly" losing out to Stevie Wonder in an archery tournament).
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2009

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>