Welcome to PatsFans.com

Funny explanation for the new CBA

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Miguel, Mar 22, 2006.

  1. Miguel

    Miguel Patriots Salary Cap Guru PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,213
    Likes Received:
    147
    Ratings:
    +410 / 2 / -1

    #75 Jersey

  2. flutie2phelan

    flutie2phelan Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Q: ... there's a new CBA. Could you please explain the ramifications of it? It's pretty complicated, isn't it?
    Vic Ketchman: No, it's really very simple. Gene Upshaw said “stick 'em up†and
    as the owners stood with their hands in the air, the players emptied their pockets.
    (edited excerpt)


    That's about how i see it too.
    But 'taint my money.
     
  3. mikey

    mikey In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I have always thought the last CBA was a payback for the previous CBA, which was heavily in favor of the owners.

    Before the last CBA, I thought NFL players got the worst bargaining agreements of all the professional sports.

    I can just imagine Tagliabue telling Upshaw back in 1992 to ease up on the negotiation to help the league stabilize their finances and help promote the league expansion. In return, Tagliabue promised Upshaw that he will repay the favor once the money starts coming in. And that is exactly what happened.

    .
     
  4. arrellbee

    arrellbee Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I think you referenced Vic's mailbag before. I now have it as a must read each day.

    You really have to wonder if Tagliabue's crew was paying attention to all of the clauses - surely they MUST have been ? Does it turn out bottom line that Upshaw was really quite happy to go to an uncapped structure and it was a take it or leave offer with all of the player friendly provisions as well as a significantly higher chunk of the pie ? Sure looks like it.

    I think the thing that bugs me the most is the emasculation of the provisions giving the teams some financial leverage over rotten player behavior. That might have the most disgusting effect on the tenor of the game for the fans.

    If this package turns out to be bad enough for the owners/teams, Tagliabue's legacy could become this last extension as opposed to all of the other fantastic work he did.
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>