Welcome to PatsFans.com

Football Outsiders: Mayo's tackles

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by ctpatsfan77, Jun 24, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,428
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +201 / 4 / -5

    More data shows Mayo all over the field - AFC East Blog - ESPN

  2. townes

    townes Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I'm not a big stat guy but well done, those actually seem like meaningful stats. Unlike baseball I think football is really hard to judge by stats as so much is dependent upon what everyone else around you is doing or not doing right. Baseball is much more of an individual sport and as such easier to evaluate statistically.
  3. RelocatedPatFan

    RelocatedPatFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,286
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +20 / 0 / -0

    That's some impressive stats. it's be great to see a breadown of where the tackles happen (like they do in basketball where they show shots taken/made).

    And with information like that you'd think more offenses will have to "Hold the Mayo"...sorry I couldn't resist :bricks:
  4. patriot lifer

    patriot lifer Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,865
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0 / -0

    #87 Jersey

    I agree. It'd be much more useful to see a more sophisticated breakout. Like some of the tackles may have occurred during gang-tackles where the opposing player was sandwiched with Mayo, OOOOHHH!!
  5. RelocatedPatFan

    RelocatedPatFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,286
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +20 / 0 / -0

    Right. Like who initiated the contact that slowed the player down if it was a gang-tackle. But, that's why you have to love football because the eye-test seems so much more meaningful than stats on a sheet.

    And glad to see you taking part of the punnage.
  6. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,397
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ratings:
    +114 / 2 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    No matter what you're looking at, it can be described statistically. The question becomes "how complicated is that statistic?" and, following from that, "do the metrics that we currently use adequately and meaningfully describe the event?"

    In baseball, as you said, the answer is usually yes, because, offensively at least, interactions are very simple. Even in baseball, though, you used to hear all of the same things that you're saying about football when it came to measuring defensive performance. The too-simple metrics that were being used actually punished fielders who had lots of of range, and of course that was wrong. That wasn't because statistics can't measure defense, though; it was because they were measuring the wrong things. It was harder to do than a simple OBP calculation, and somehow people made the leap from there to conclude that it was impossible. It wasn't, though, as the last few years of innovation in this area have shown.

    The same holds true for football. The issue isn't that stats can't describe it: it's that we've been using overly simplistic, altogether insignificant stats for far, far too long. We chose ease of compilation and use over actual relevant. Football Outsiders is one of a number of sources that are slowly changing that. It will be far harder to do effectively than baseball, and the end result won't be nearly as telling, but there are always extraordinarily insightful statistics out there to be found. In fact, I can all but guarantee that a lot of them have already been developed, but individual teams have them under lock and key. There's a reason why pretty much every pro sports franchise in the country has MIT nerds locked in the basement somewhere.
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2011
  7. unoriginal

    unoriginal Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +42 / 2 / -1

    The data also supports the conjecture that our pass defense is really weak in the middle of the field, particularly in the zones our linebackers cover.
  8. strngplyr

    strngplyr Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes Received:
    51
    Ratings:
    +133 / 3 / -0

    I love what Mayo is doing, but I hope some of that data isn't skewed by our #2 corner situation, getting kicked off receivers backs like they're riding a bull and forcing Mayo to do cleanup.

    Can't wait til Bodden is back, I think we can have a pretty damn impressive defense when we have 2 solid corners (not that I wasn't impressed with the 2nd half of last year, lets see a repeat performance for all of this season).
  9. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    23,050
    Likes Received:
    348
    Ratings:
    +786 / 8 / -10

    Disable Jersey

    Sorta the 21st century version of keeping the dwarfs working in the underground mines under BB's Sauron eye
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2011
  10. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,428
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +201 / 4 / -5

    Actually, I didn't include this part, but the FO article (click through the ESPN article to get there) suggests that Mayo's "success rate"* is on the lower end for LBs, but not unacceptably so; that said, success rate tends to be fairly proportional to how close to the LOS you play (the #s for safeties, for example, are abysmal).

    *FO generally defines success on an offensive play as picking up 40% of yards on first down (e.g., 4 on 1-and-10 but 6 on 1-and-15), 60% of yards on second down (e.g., 4 on 2-and-6), and 100% of yards on third or fourth down. So a successful tackle means the receiver doesn't advance the ball that far.
  11. Triumph

    Triumph Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    6,172
    Likes Received:
    62
    Ratings:
    +105 / 22 / -12

    #32 Jersey

    Very true.
  12. ausbacker

    ausbacker Brady > Manning. PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,203
    Likes Received:
    117
    Ratings:
    +278 / 4 / -2

    #51 Jersey

    It also supports the idea that Jerod Mayo is a baller and should be openly celebrated as such.

    Mayo > Lewis.
  13. supafly

    supafly PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    14,095
    Likes Received:
    191
    Ratings:
    +456 / 3 / -7

    #24 Jersey

    I'm not certain that I'd go quite that far just yet, as the comparison is extremely debatable in many ways. However, just the fact that the subject is indeed debatable bodes very well for Mayo, us fans, and everyone involved.

    I totally agree at your 'baller' comment though, he has proven himself to be quite a tackling machine, a good locker room leader, and I hope he's here for many yrs to come.

    I also agree with unoriginal's comment that it also points out our weakness in the middle in the secondary aspect too, and hopefully that will progressively get better this yr.
  14. patriotscpfc

    patriotscpfc Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Here's a question.

    How many of Mayo's run tackles were 5+ yards past the LOS?
  15. Sivy

    Sivy Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,060
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Why are people so negative? Its a simple stat that shows he is the best at something in the nfl..why does everyone havee to pick apart everything and make it seem like its not good.

    Good job Mayo.
  16. stinkypete

    stinkypete Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,264
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +28 / 0 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    Tackling Linebackers | ProFootballFocus.com

    This seconds Football Outsiders analysis, and for all the hate PFF gets, this is actually an objective analysis.

    Look at who's #1...sure, it's a much smaller sample size, but we're clearly looking at the best pair of tackling ILBs in the game, playing behind a top 3 NT.
  17. TheSolderKing

    TheSolderKing Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,339
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    we better extend that BEAST ASAP before that BS URFA crap comes into play. I like him sooo much losing him would be awful:mad:
  18. Observer

    Observer Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    Mayo is pretty solid; Spikes too. Don't really know why it seems we have trouble with the dreaded 'middle zone' of the field against the pass. I think that is more a function of the play lasting too long because of the front five getting completely engaged with blockers and the ILBs having to cover a large area for a bit too long.
  19. ay-yo

    ay-yo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Spikes was a liability in coverage last year. He bit on seemingly every play action. He was def getting better as the year went along though. Sucked to see him get suspended because he only would have improved more over those last 4 games. The holes left from spikes could explain why Mayo had so many tackles.
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2011
  20. Observer

    Observer Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    You may be right about spikes being weaker in coverage. I don't think that the problem stems primarily from the inside linebackers, though. Maybe Spikes struggled more than others but I think that no matter who you put there, they would be forced to play on the back foot, leading to the vacant free area that we all hated to see.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>