- Joined
- Dec 21, 2004
- Messages
- 12,466
- Reaction score
- 7,460
As this draft gets closer and closer to unfolding, we hear lots of rumors about teams wanting to trade down (Vikings for instance) and some teams wanting to go up (Philly for instance) but regardless of who moves where, the chances are a player or player(s) will probably still be on the board at #27, that most draftniks had with a top 20 or 15 grade.
So wouldn't it make more sense for BB leverage #27 in a trade (hopefully for a 2012 2nd and a 2013 1st) and then use the pick aT #31?
So if a player like Copples or Keuchly or someone or similar quality tumbles to #27, does anybody else see BB reversing his usual playbook in the first round?
I see him doing this because I can not see BB being locked into any one player when picking so low in the first round. My guess is he will have a couple of different players targeted and because of this, he can always come back at #31 and take whichever one is left on the board at that time while using #27 for a max return.
So wouldn't it make more sense for BB leverage #27 in a trade (hopefully for a 2012 2nd and a 2013 1st) and then use the pick aT #31?
So if a player like Copples or Keuchly or someone or similar quality tumbles to #27, does anybody else see BB reversing his usual playbook in the first round?
I see him doing this because I can not see BB being locked into any one player when picking so low in the first round. My guess is he will have a couple of different players targeted and because of this, he can always come back at #31 and take whichever one is left on the board at that time while using #27 for a max return.