Welcome to PatsFans.com

Five picks, in whatever order

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by mgteich, Mar 19, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,933
    Likes Received:
    133
    Ratings:
    +355 / 26 / -4

    The order always depends on comparative value. I suspect that we would all be reasonably fine if we used our first five picks for

    DEFENSIVE END

    OUTSIDE LINEBACKER

    RUNNING BACK

    WIDE RECEIVER

    TIGHT END

    And we would be fine if we sign a wide receiver instead, and then subsituted an inside linebacker.
     
  2. Patspsycho

    Patspsycho Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0


    I would argue for placing priority on RB. We really need to take the pressure off Brady. These days other teams are just zeroing on Brady. Their D sets don't even respect our running game, and rightfully so.
     
  3. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,390
    Likes Received:
    545
    Ratings:
    +1,752 / 78 / -77

    Disable Jersey

    This team's biggest needs are at DE, multiple LB positions and/or roles, WR and TE. There's also more need for an OG than an RB. Drafting a running back high in this draft would be a poor use of available resources.
     
  4. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    It's hard to chose because we don't know how the cards will fall. But, I'll take a crack at it.

    1. OLB or just a pass rusher
    2. WR
    3. RB
    4. ILB
    5. OT/G
     
  5. stevedogc

    stevedogc Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I put more blame on the offensive playcalling. I think the Pats were way to predictable last season. I think we could use a fresh face at RB, but I dont see a big difference with whats out there right now. FA is slim, and is there a huge difference with a 1st rounder (Spiller or Mathews) and a mid rounder (Tate)?
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2010
  6. Sicilian

    Sicilian Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    5,111
    Likes Received:
    193
    Ratings:
    +516 / 2 / -3

    DE

    OLB

    G/C

    WR (even if we sign someone, I wouldn't mind seeing someone who can develop down the road)

    Toss up between ILB and TE
     
  7. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,986
    Likes Received:
    108
    Ratings:
    +182 / 1 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    Obviously the way the draft goes would change this but if it all fell and we could have our choice of need at any pick I would want

    1st RD a RB to take pressure off Brady and the WRs and to kill clock in the 4th so protecting the lead in the fourth doesn't fall only on the D. I have my heart set on Ryan Matthews.

    1st 2nd RDer a OLB we need an OLB who can produce a pass rush

    2nd 2nd RDer a 5-technique D-linemen

    3rd 2nd RDer a OLB We need an OLB who can produce a pass rush. we need this so bad I say try twice there are 2 starting OLBs and in our best days we had 3 or 4 guys who could play well at OLB.

    1st 4th RDer WR or TE - something that can be a pass catching option. I don't think the need here is for some outrages talent like many thought we needed Boldin but we do need something because we have a lot of question marks at the position between Welkers injury and Tate's developement and not having a back up to Crumpler.
     
  8. Marqui

    Marqui In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,911
    Likes Received:
    63
    Ratings:
    +213 / 9 / -1

    I think we should draft another pass rushing OLB instead of a WR.
     
  9. Lampshade

    Lampshade Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,268
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I'm sorely lacking in knowledge of the college players this year, but the positions I am most interested in:

    OLB
    DE
    TE

    WR
    LB of any sort.

    I'm nowhere near as low on Guyton, or the receivers as most seem to be. RB I've very little interest in.
     
  10. patsinthesnow

    patsinthesnow PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,772
    Likes Received:
    343
    Ratings:
    +624 / 14 / -5

    #87 Jersey

    I agree, this would be good.

    Trade #22 for SD #28 and #92. (They'll accept if Best or Spiller is there, and its equal based on value chart).

    #28 Jared Odrick (will play the 3-4 DE, a big need).

    #44 Ricky Sapp (OLB)

    #47 Damien Williams (WR)

    #53 Dennis Pitta (TE)

    #92 Ben Tate (RB)
     
  11. carolinatony

    carolinatony In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,845
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    1. OLB or just a pass rusher TWO
    2. WR TWO We have Moss and ?
    3. RB - One who can break one for aTD every so often.
    4. ILB
    5. OT/G We passed on 4th and 2 says it all.
     
  12. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Don't see Sapp lasting until 44,Late 30s at best
     
  13. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,817
    Likes Received:
    182
    Ratings:
    +371 / 11 / -28

    Last year our problem was more on Offense, than D.. but do want to start that argument again...

    I would go with the best RB @ 22... then go with the best available DE's and OLB's with the seconds..
     
  14. HarkDawg

    HarkDawg Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0



    I love your order. I am still banking on ( Maroney to Washington for x).
     
  15. stevedogc

    stevedogc Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I'd be extremely happy with this draft. If TE Gronkowski was avaliable at #53, I'd go with him over Pita. Both Odrick and Sapp are questionable at the spots you have them. Very possible both could be gone. But also possible they will still be there.
     
  16. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,986
    Likes Received:
    108
    Ratings:
    +182 / 1 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    I agree with your assesment except I wouldn't go with Best RB at 22 I really only want Matthews as far as a RB in the first but he is the player in this draft that we can resonably get that I want the most.
     
  17. Fencer

    Fencer Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,907
    Likes Received:
    49
    Ratings:
    +148 / 2 / -15

    #12 Jersey

    Top-tier draft needs, IMO:

    DE and OLB
    TE
    RB (bruiser)

    Why not the others?

    WR -- the biggest need is until Welker returns, and relying on a rookie for that is a wild gamble. And in Tate, Edelman, and even Stanbach we have some young ones being developed.

    ILB -- We often don't need two on the field. That makes Mayo/Guyton look not-ridiculous. And McKenzie is our rookie.

    RB (speedster) -- I still have hopes for Maroney, and for Faulk's longevity.

    P -- a top-tier need, but not a top-tier pick.
     
  18. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,986
    Likes Received:
    108
    Ratings:
    +182 / 1 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    I wish more people would realize what you are saying about WR.
     
  19. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,933
    Likes Received:
    133
    Ratings:
    +355 / 26 / -4

    And who do you expect to develop to replace Moss in 2011: Edelman, Tate or Stanback?

     
  20. alphilip77

    alphilip77 Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #22 - Jared Odrick. Truly a beast that is good against the run and can get to the QB. While I think you could possibly trade down to a late first and still acquire him, I would not fu*k around with that scenario. Anyone from the Cowboys, Jets, Colts, or Chargers could get him. IMO, stay put on this pick, he is DEFINITELY worth it.

    #44 - Jerry Hughes. While he doesn't possess the height that Bill wants, he is an excellent pass rusher, something we haven't had in a while.

    #47 - Damian Williams. All around great receiver. Could eventually be Moss' successor and would provide another weapon for Brady (Moss, Welker, Edelman, Tate, Williams = sick)

    #53 - (Trade) Greg Olsen. Chicago is pretty desperate for draft picks since they don't happen to have any in the first 3 rounds, so getting Olsen with this pick would be a steal. Has a pretty affordable contract, another deadly slot/outside guy, and is vastly better than any TE you could get in Round 2 or the entire draft for that matter. First round talent for a second round pick. Sold!

    That's how I would use our first four picks.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>