ESPNews reports that the Ravens have waived Jamal Lewis

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by broadwayjoe, Feb 28, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe In the Starting Line-Up

    The move was expected because of Lewis' roster bonus, and only means that the two sides weren't able to come to an agreement on a restructured contract. Lewis was also cut last year and returned to Baltimore after testing free agency. The same scenario could happen again, but the Ravens should look to upgrade before settling again on Lewis, who is a part-timer at best at this point.

    http://www.baltimoreravens.com/

    I'm sure he will not be out there very long.
     
  2. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Pro Bowl Player

    #12 Jersey

    Maybe a good fit here...likely a split time RB and he is a decent sized back,I would give it a shot.
     
  3. psychoPat

    psychoPat Role Player PatsFans.com Supporter

    Jailbird.
    Patriots don't do those.
     
  4. carolinatony

    carolinatony In the Starting Line-Up

    We will pass on him with his track record
     
  5. gomezcat

    gomezcat It's SIR Moderator to you Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    I'd be happy to see him here, but I suspect he'll have a lot of suitors.
     
  6. PATSNUTme

    PATSNUTme Paranoid Homer Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    #75 Jersey

    We don't have any orange jumpsuits.
     
  7. Digger44

    Digger44 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    I don't care about his rap. It was a weird one. Not like a Bungle. He is young and would be a good compliment to Maroney. It all depends on what they do with Dillon and what Lewis would sign for.
     
  8. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    I don't know if I would go too overboard about his criminal record. Lewis basically put his friend in touch with a drug dealer. That was his crime. Yes, it is illegal and wrong. It happened in college and he hasn't been in trouble since. But is no worse than Corey Dillon did in high school.

    I am not high on taking bad characters in general and am not sure I would want Lewis, but what he did is no worse than what many of the other players people want us to get has done.
     
  9. salty

    salty On the Game Day Roster

    Bad seed and, even though he is still relatively young, he appeared to be washed up last year. Only guy I saw running slower was our own Corey Dillon.
     
  10. Danny Boy®

    Danny Boy® Banned

    Other than one very good year, has he done anything?
     
  11. patsfan55

    patsfan55 In the Starting Line-Up

    #95 Jersey

    he has looked very slow ever since his monster yr
     
  12. spacecrime

    spacecrime Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    No, and I don't see why people want him. He looked horrible last year. I'd rather re-sign Patrick Pass. Well, sort of ... Okay, not Pass. But not Jamal Lewis, either.
     
  13. Danny Boy®

    Danny Boy® Banned


    I'm not saying he's junk, I'd sign him for short money....kinda like what we gave to Smith a few years ago.
     
  14. salty

    salty On the Game Day Roster

    Yep. He had something like 400 carries that year, and I think it just totally broke him down. There is a history of that happening with RBs who get that much of a workload in one season. Anyone remember Jamal Anderson from Atlanta?

    And I can only assume that the people clamoring for him here didn't actually watch him play at all last season.
     
  15. Brady'sButtBoy

    Brady'sButtBoy 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    #12 Jersey

    Bob Kraft to Billy B. - My only rule is, no "thugs." Jamal would have to prove he's been going to Sunday school to get past this one...
     
  16. pheenix11

    pheenix11 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    I don't want any part of this dip****.

    1. He's a criminal
    2. He sucks
     
  17. gomezcat

    gomezcat It's SIR Moderator to you Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    I suddenly feel about 100 stupid on a scale of one to ten. How did I forget that? :(
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page