Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by IcyPatriot, Jun 28, 2010.
Rodney Dangerfield With Tits
I don't care if it's a one-legged, hunchbacked, bucktoothed, shemale with an eye-patch, as long as they actually respect the constitution. Then again, it's been a long time since that's mattered in the selection process.
Name the show.
Rodney already had tits, Harry Boy!:bricks:
SCOTUS has moved in the political direction more and more with each selection unfortunately - right and left.
I hate it. Of all the things that are wrong with US politics right now, this is one of my largest problems. We're ******* with the constitution.
Looks more like Nathan Lane:
The Gregory Brothers have noted that the actual media have just as little depth in their commentary... but they're funnier than youz guyz
YouTube - Auto-Tune the News #12: weed. lesbian allegaytions.
Sadly, the people being selected, as well as those doing the selecting, don't care for, nor do they respect, the Constitution. I think they view it as a far too simplistic, past it's prime document, that doesn't deal with the(ir personally percieved) intricacies of modern society. Consider the comments by Obama himself.
Or take George Bush's lack of respect for the Constitution's restrictions on government power, by way of the numerous policies, or actions undertaken by his administration. Be it with the issue surrounding enemy combatants, detention, or eaves dropping on telecommunications. Let's not forget the famous quote either.
I predict Patton Oswalt will be hosting SNL soon.
:rofl: .... absolutely .....
As we watched Kagan debate the Twilight movie, Ralph Nader had 36 questions for her, I quoted a few. He had lots of good ones on corporations:
Ralph Nader: 36 Questions for Elena Kagan
Those would be good questions. But really, wouldn't we all rather know what a Jewish woman was doing on Christmas Eve?
Separate names with a comma.