- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 6,037
- Reaction score
- 4,157
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I actually like when people post Easterbrook articles. Lets me stay current on the parts that I would care about while avoiding giving him page hits and having to read about which cheerleader he's jerking off to each weak.
Once again, Gregg Easterbrook has written a high-profile article based on speculation and no facts. The worst part is, he tries to morph his opinion into some semblance of truth.
In his article, Easterbrook suggests that the Patriots highly benefited from taping the Rams' walkthrough prior to Super Bowl XXXVI. This is a rumor, and such videotaping has not been confirmed, yet Easterbrook stretches this rumor to further his mission in bashing the Patriots (as he has done all season long). He states that since the Patriots only won by three points, then their supposed knowledge of the Rams' red zone plays vaulted them to their win. However, the Rams only had one red zone possession during the game, and they scored a touchdown.
Furthermore, Easterbrook bemoans the lack of justification for the severe penalty issued by Roger Goodell. He reasons that if what the Patriots did by videotaping signals wasn't such a big deal, then why was the punishment so large? But earlier this year, he bemoaned the lack of punishment for what he deemed a grievous crime in sports. What gives?
This article wasn't even part of TMQ, which is on Page 2. It was given the same treatment as an actual journalistic article from the likes of Len Pasquarelli or John Clayton. The aforementioned writers form opinions, but only when they have facts to back them up. Easterbrook has crossed the line with his biased and unfounded opinions, and ESPN has allowed him to do so.
If the materials really were minor stuff, why the months of "No comment"?
Let's step back off the ledge. Letekro, don't get me wrong, as I'm not picking on you, but this situation must not take away from the anticipation of the big game. To even consider these allegations at this time is silly.
There's a game tomorrow between two good teams. One has had the most incredible season to date in NFL history. To think about anything else at this time takes away from this historical weekend. Don't allow that to happen.
ESPN has already edited out the 'each time they reached the red zone' portion of the article. The implication is still there however.
Easterbrook is a well known anti-semite who has published anti semitic statements that got him fired previously from ESPN. Is it really that must of a stretch for him to carry a grudge against Kraft who he knows is Jewish.
Until proven, this malicious innuendo fueled by poor sports and sour apples does a lot to create an "us versus them" mentality that Bill Parcells tried so hard to construct.
Like his protege, Belichick is going to use this to good effect. What I once thought would be a close, nail-biter is going to turn into a fourth-quarter rout.
Go, Patriots! Speculations like this are disrespectful IF FALSE--and there's not a scintilla of evidence that they are anything else.
Why would a team let a guy sit in the empty stands with video equipment? My high school coach would have been all over that. People just can't accept the truth that the Patriots rule.
Bingo, sad to say we have Bingo......
Do no think for one second that this anti - semite along with the "old guard" from the NFL are not out to get youe NE Patriots solely due the Krafts religion.
Very sad and very true