manxman2601
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 30,077
- Reaction score
- 25,532
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.All three of Branch, Wilfork and Easley (I think) made plays on the opposite end of the LOS to which they started. That might sound a small thing but when you are often only playing two down linemen, that level of strength and athleticism is important. None of the three are just hole cloggers.
All three of Branch, Wilfork and Easley (I think) made plays on the opposite end of the LOS to which they started. That might sound a small thing but when you are often only playing two down linemen, that level of strength and athleticism is important. None of the three are just hole cloggers.
I have always been a fan of Alan Branch, I wanted to sign him entering last season, he is a big body, under 30 years old, with solid talent. I hope he sticks around next season as well.Easley was good last night. How many snaps did Alan Branch get - I liked what I saw from him, too. Siliga coming back, (hopefully) Chandler coming back soon - this DL is getting ferocious.
If Branch/Wilfork/Siliga can be that effective against the run, the pats get teams in third and long...with Jones back, Easley regaining explosiveness, Collins playing out of his mind and that defensive backfield, I like our chances when teams are in third and long!
I agree with both you and Mayo. I, too, have said a few times earlier this season that I didn't see the quickness for which he has become known. I live in Gainesville and saw him play in person. The kid is just lightning off the line. He showed it last night and I do believe it's the first time this season I've seen it as well. Nonetheless, Mayo's point is obviously still correct (as well). The kid is showing steady progression and, as a coach, player or fan, that's what you want to see.Mayo I wasn't being overly critical I just didn't see the explosiveness he's gifted with up until last night. The concerns about him was valid.
This is spot on. And we know that "doing the important stuff right" and being versatile are much, much more important to BB than making some highlight plays and piling up stats. Easley is having a solid rookie season, recovering from injury and playing through some. I suspect BB is quite happy with what he's done so far.
Easley was good last night. How many snaps did Alan Branch get - I liked what I saw from him, too. Siliga coming back, (hopefully) Chandler coming back soon - this DL is getting ferocious.
Does this mean we can put away the mourning dress for Tommy Kelly?
Weird to remember that DL beef was considered a glaring roster weakness only weeks ago.
You mean before the signing of Walker and Branch, and with Easley injured (at least not at 100%)?Does this mean we can put away the mourning dress for Tommy Kelly?
Weird to remember that DL beef was considered a glaring roster weakness only weeks ago.
You mean before the signing of Walker and Branch, and with Easley injured (at least not at 100%)?
yeah It seems like the team had to go and replace Kelly with Branch so cutting Kelly doesn't seem to have made a lot of sense for the Pats.I'd still love to have Kelly - he's been playing GREAT for Arizona. Think he might have gotten hurt yesterday. But yeah, Branch is a very similar player and a lot younger. Love the pick-up as long as he's got his head straight.
I'm a firm believer in what Seattle did last year - limit snaps - go beast.
I'm sorry, but you guys don't even realize you ridiculous you sound. A rookie being on the "bust list" after 9 games? "About time" for a guy coming off an ACL injury to show explosiveness? Please. This makes the guys in Dumb and Dumber look like geniuses in comparison.
I'd still love to have Kelly - he's been playing GREAT for Arizona. Think he might have gotten hurt yesterday. But yeah, Branch is a very similar player and a lot younger. Love the pick-up as long as he's got his head straight.
I'm a firm believer in what Seattle did last year - limit snaps - go beast.
Does this mean we can put away the mourning dress for Tommy Kelly?
15 snaps I believe.Not sure. Reiss will have them up later. But they were probably minimal as Colts pretty much abandoned the run.
But there was one play that stood out for me. Branch getting off his blocker and getting to the side and making it a minimal gain, it may have even been for no gain. And it wasn't Richardson either, it was Bradshaw.