Welcome to PatsFans.com

Drudge Jesus

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Harry Boy, Apr 9, 2010.

  1. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    38,805
    Likes Received:
    119
    Ratings:
    +295 / 1 / -7

    GINGRICH: Obama 'most radical president ever'...
    LIMBAUGH: Obama 'inflicting untold damage on this great country'...
    PALIN: Obama's Nuke Stance Like Kid Who Says 'Punch Me in Face'...
    LIZ CHENEY: Obama Putting America on 'Path to Decline'...
    HANNITY: Obama 'Is a Socialist'...
    SAVAGE: 'Obama The Destroyer'...
    Harry Boy: Obama Has Ears Like Ping Pong Paddles.......
    DRUDGE REPORT 2010®
  2. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,200
    Likes Received:
    221
    Ratings:
    +310 / 7 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    Palin also thinks Michael Steele is doing a "great job."

    So does Newt.

    Many of us remain unimpressed with their honesty or their ability to judge character.
  3. Patsfanin Philly

    Patsfanin Philly Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    The same could be said for those that pal around with the likes of Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers and Michael Flager.
  4. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,200
    Likes Received:
    221
    Ratings:
    +310 / 7 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    Except they don't any more.
  5. mcgraw_wv

    mcgraw_wv Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,257
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    On Obama's NUKE Stance....

    What he has accomplished is what Reagan was asking for during his time... Obama just had the ability to accomplish it.

    The Daily Show made the Palin show look like an idiot last night.
  6. Patsfanin Philly

    Patsfanin Philly Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey


    Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't part of President Obama's pledge that he won't develop new technologies for nuclear weapons when President Reagan was criticized for advocating Star Wars technologies?Slight difference there.
  7. mcgraw_wv

    mcgraw_wv Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,257
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Ummm... perhaps??

    I didn't mention Obama stance on new weapon development...

    Again, Obama's reduction in 1/3 of the Nuke weapons, is what Regaen wanted but could not accomplish.
  8. Patsfanin Philly

    Patsfanin Philly Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    My point was that Reagan wanted to diminish the number of warheads while still developing the next generation of weapons. In contrast, President Obama wants to cut the number of warheads while limiting development of the next generation with no concomitant promise from China or Russia which will have national security implications.
    Reagan's desire to cut the number was in the form of a treaty with Russia. The halt to development currently is a unilateral move.
    I don't think that this treaty signed yesterday is a forgone conclusion to be approved by the Senate. If it is framed by Republicans as part of a "disarming America", I can see moderate Democrats who might be in a tough election this year voting against it lest they be labeled (rightly or wrongly) as part of that group.
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2010
  9. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    40,824
    Likes Received:
    89
    Ratings:
    +150 / 3 / -19

    We continue to build ships, airplanes and the like.. it is hardly disarming a nation, perhaps we can only kill all of mankind 35 times over instead of 50 times over..

    The only interest any of this serves are the defense contractors, who are out of control piggies feeding at the taxpayer..

    Usually these type of treaties are overwhelmingly approved..

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>