Welcome to PatsFans.com

Do you WANT Cassel to remain the starting QB?

Discussion in 'The Practice Squad' started by Wendel, Oct 13, 2008.

?

Do you want Cassel to be our starting QB?

  1. Yes!

    32.9%
  2. No!

    67.1%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,995
    Likes Received:
    322
    Ratings:
    +809 / 5 / -3

    O'Connell just isn't ready. If people are satisfied with tanking the season to develop O'Connell, then I say go for it. But the guy came into this league with tons of raw talent, but horrible mechanics. At this point, O'Connell is not an upgrade over Cassel. Maybe in a month or two he may be, but I find it hard to believe he has corrected all his mechanics problems at this point in the season.

    Like it or not, Cassel is the best chance for the Pats to win at this point.
  2. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    I got an idea.

    Cassel starts and he plays until he has a drive does end in a TD or FG. Then O'Connell goes in. O'Connell plays until he has a drive that doesn't result in a score. Once O'Connell has drive that doesn't result in a score Gurtz goes in. Gurtz plays until he has a drive that doesn't end in a score. At which time Cassel goes back in. Cassel plays until he has a drive that doesn't result in a score. etc.

    :disagreement:
  3. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,607
    Likes Received:
    173
    Ratings:
    +389 / 5 / -5

    Regardless of whether or not you're making a joke, there is a serious flaw with that plan--unless the Pats carry all three on the 45-man roster. Namely, if the emergency QB enters the game for any reason prior to the start of the fourth quarter, no QB on the 45-man roster can re-enter the game, period.
  4. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    So we carry all three on the 45 man roster. If I read this board correctly there is nothing more important to the success of this team than benching a QB immediately after any poor performance of the offense.
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2008
  5. Boston Jay

    Boston Jay Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,685
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Cassel will most likely remain the starting QB. Definitely not my choice (I mean who wouldn't want to pick up Joe Montana in his prime or rewind to week 1 and prevent that shot from happening), but I don't think O'Connell can do any better with this group playing the way it is.

    Personally I don't want to see O'Connell in yet. Might get killed back there.
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2008
  6. vandergraafgenerator

    vandergraafgenerator Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Does it matter?
    We're going to get him anyway so wtf.
  7. Patjew

    Patjew PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,604
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +107 / 2 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    No, it doesn't matter. Nor does anything else we post here. We do it for fun.
  8. NJPatsfan26

    NJPatsfan26 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    2,509
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Yes we do it for fun....We as fans on a sports board do not know anything on what BB and his coaching staff are thinking.

    All I can think of is it is going to be a long week for everyone in the Patriots Organization with a lot of reviewing of this game and practice on plays that went horribly wrong.
  9. BradyToMoss

    BradyToMoss Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Let the Kevin O'Connell era begin. Let him start this week at home against a piss-poor Denver defense.

    The look on Rodney Harrison's face last night after the game and his comments spoke volumes about how deflating it was that Cassel could not punch that ball in the endzone. This team has no confidence in him and it's spilling over into every facet of the football team.

    Time for a change, let's do it now before it's too late.
  10. abejarano12

    abejarano12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I totaly agree with you. Matt is going to go through growing pains and from what I saw he had some bright spots. Right now he is he best we got.
  11. AzPatsFan

    AzPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    6,183
    Likes Received:
    98
    Ratings:
    +223 / 19 / -10

    THERE IS NO ONE ELSE this year. Grow up!
  12. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    26,502
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +341 / 3 / -13

    Cassel just doesn't show much raw talent and it's obvious. You can't compare Brady's early games to Cassel's. Brady showed glimpse's of brilliance while Cassel...well, what you see is what you're gonna get.
  13. neuronet

    neuronet Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +7 / 2 / -0

    #87 Jersey

    Obviously I'd rather have Brady as the starting QB! :p
  14. dtbrks

    dtbrks Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I voted no, but what choice do I or We have?
    He is our starter until BB says otherwise or until next year when Tom comes back.
  15. PatsFanSince74

    PatsFanSince74 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,953
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +94 / 3 / -1

    For now, yes. He played last night without a running game and with a weak O line. Maybe he could have avoided a couple of sacks and rushes by getting rid of the ball faster, but he wasn't getting much help. Also, a porous secondary had him behind the eight ball all night. He's no Tom Brady, but I'm not ready to pull the plug; nor, I suspect, is BB.
  16. Wendel

    Wendel Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    The people have clearly spoken.
  17. NJPatsfan26

    NJPatsfan26 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    2,509
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    yes Wendel, the people have clearly spoken.

    WE are not the coaching staff so our little wants and desires on this web site mean NOTHING.

    So you can keep this little victory to yourself.
  18. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    Given the number of people who have you on their ignore list, any poll you conduct is going to be skewed.
  19. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,873
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +59 / 2 / -0

    Not if the OL is going to continue its level of play - if there's not going to be much pass protection I don't see the point of keeping a pocket passer in there... better to go with O'Connell who is able to do more than Cassell on the scramble and make things happen.

    But that's saying more about the OL than about Cassell. In a perfect world the OL consistently does their job and he has the time to make his reads and complete passes.

    In that situation, I want Cassell.
  20. ThePatsfan08

    ThePatsfan08 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    O'Connell is my cousin.

    Talking on the phone with him the other day, he said that BB will most likely play him against the Colts. Look for him there.

    Kibosh.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>