Welcome to PatsFans.com

Do you believe in Evolution

Discussion in 'Religion and Lighthearted Discussion' started by SalemPats, Jun 23, 2014.

?

Do you believe in Evolution

  1. Yes - Science says it does

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
  2. No way

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  1. SalemPats

    SalemPats In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2013
    Messages:
    2,055
    Likes Received:
    109
    Ratings:
    +339 / 38 / -21

    No Jersey Selected

    Do you believe in Evolution?
     
  2. Tunescribe

    Tunescribe PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    17,384
    Likes Received:
    706
    Ratings:
    +2,464 / 15 / -23

    #61 Jersey

    Evolution is not a "belief," it's a matter of biological science that has been proven many, many times over.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Boogs

    Boogs 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +289 / 9 / -5

    I believe God made humans, and that we did not come from monkeys.
     
  4. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,628
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +473 / 13 / -14

    Well I don't 'believe' in anything when it comes to science.

    Science is about what one can prove and has a predictive component.

    I don't know of any proven mechanism that can be replicated in any experiment where one goes from inorganic molecules to a life form of an sort.
     
  5. Tunescribe

    Tunescribe PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    17,384
    Likes Received:
    706
    Ratings:
    +2,464 / 15 / -23

    #61 Jersey

    That's because everything on earth has evolved beyond our ability to replicate what initially happened four billion or so years ago in terms of life-sparking chemical interactions.
     
  6. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,628
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +473 / 13 / -14

    What sort of Chemical reaction is life sparking?

    What is a life spark?

    What causes the replication of information?


    How does the information know that it is information?

    There is no physical mechanism known for going from a non information based chemical reaction from an information generating set of chemical reactions. Since we have no ability to replicate the initial step we are speculating, like the people who 'believe' in Intelligent Design are speculating.
     
  7. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,641
    Likes Received:
    175
    Ratings:
    +432 / 8 / -4

    Evolution isn't the same as creation...
     
  8. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,628
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +473 / 13 / -14



    Who mentioned creation?

    The Buddhist & Taoist essentially are dealing with an intelligent design model that isn't related to Judeo Christian thought. The take for granted that the universe is self aware.
     
  9. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,641
    Likes Received:
    175
    Ratings:
    +432 / 8 / -4

    Let me re-phrase: evolution isn't the same as how life began.
     
  10. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,628
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +473 / 13 / -14

    Well the proposition that life 'happened' by random chance and that the life we see here evolved by a series of accidents over the existence of this planet.

    We don't know of and cannot produce any process that goes from random chemicals to a life form of any sort (ie a virus or bacteria for example).
     
  11. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,641
    Likes Received:
    175
    Ratings:
    +432 / 8 / -4

    The former isn't evolution. Only the latter is.
     
  12. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,628
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +473 / 13 / -14

    Without to former the latter never occurs...
     
  13. SB39

    SB39 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,423
    Likes Received:
    250
    Ratings:
    +766 / 45 / -57

    [​IMG]
    The Theory of Evolution
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  14. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,641
    Likes Received:
    175
    Ratings:
    +432 / 8 / -4

    Sure -- but that doesn't make them the same.

    Without the former, nothing occurs. Should we discuss how life arose as part of every topic?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,628
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +473 / 13 / -14

    Well the model is either divine intervention/ creation, blind random chance, or a self aware intelligent universe where the game is rigged to produce self aware life.

    Evolution follows the blind random chance model, if true then one has to identify the physical process that goes from inorganic process to an organic process. The statistical probabilities based on information mathematics seems to be raising questions in the biology community.

    They evolutionist will have to provide an reproducible explanation to move from theory to law. If we find that life is widespread across the galaxy then that points more to the ID model but of course isn't proof.
     
  16. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,641
    Likes Received:
    175
    Ratings:
    +432 / 8 / -4

    No, evolution does not require an explanation of how life arose. Those are two different things.

    Statistical probabilities are BS when it comes to the question of how life arose.

    And no, life existing throughout the universe does not point to an ID model. Life probably does exist elsewhere, imo, given how vast the universe is.

    That has nothing to do with how life -- or the universe itself -- arose.
     
  17. Bobsyouruncle

    Bobsyouruncle 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,590
    Likes Received:
    227
    Ratings:
    +591 / 10 / -4

    Chico's right. Two different things. Origin of life is a different theory, but basically a mystery. Evolution, to some degree isn't theory either- it's an observation. It's the mechanisms for evolution that are theory. There's still some mysteries in evolution. Theory of evolution has evolved and will continue to do so.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. james87654

    james87654 Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    144
    Ratings:
    +499 / 36 / -28

    #3 Jersey

    yes i do believe in evolution
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>