Welcome to PatsFans.com

Did the surge stop the violence?

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Patters, Jul 23, 2008.

  1. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,757
    Likes Received:
    130
    Ratings:
    +167 / 4 / -4

    http://www.iraqbodycount.org/analysis/numbers/2007/

    Year.......Civilians Killed
    2003......10,077 – 12,010
    2004......09,741 – 10,573
    2005......13,071 – 14,324
    2006......25,699 – 27,519
    2007......22,586 – 24,159

    * The most violent 12-month period in Iraq’s recent history extended from July 2006 to June 2007, with 29,625 to 31,852 civilian deaths recorded.
    * Trends from mid-2007 onwards show monthly violence levels on the decrease.
    * Since March 2007 every month has seen more civilian deaths outside Baghdad than inside it. This has never happened before.
    * Per-capita, the five most violent governorates in Iraq during 2007 were:
    1. Diyala, at 255 violent civilian deaths per 100,000 inhabitants (up 29% from 197/100k in 2006)
    2. Baghdad, at 164/100k (down 39% from 267/100k)
    3. Anbar, at 122/100k (up 61% from 76/100k) 4
    4. Salah al-Din, at 120/100k (up 26% from 95/100k)
    5. Ninewa, at 100/100k (up 143% from 41/100k)


    http://www.iraqbodycount.org/about/

    IBC’s documentary evidence is drawn from crosschecked media reports of violent events leading to the death of civilians, or of bodies being found, and is supplemented by the careful review and integration of hospital, morgue, NGO and official figures.

    Systematically extracted details about deadly incidents and the individuals killed in them are stored with every entry in the database. The minimum details always extracted are the number killed, where, and when.

    Confusion about the numbers produced by the project can be avoided by bearing in mind that:

    * IBC’s figures are not ‘estimates’ but a record of actual, documented deaths.
    * IBC records solely violent deaths.
    * IBC records solely civilian (strictly, ‘non-combatant’) deaths.
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2008
  2. ljuneau

    ljuneau Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I'm not going to dispute your numbers since I have no idea if they are accurate or not. However, to conclude if the surge has reduced the violence or not, wouldn't you have to post the data for 2008? I don't see numbers for this year.

    Post credible numbers for 2008 and maybe we could answer your question.
  3. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,757
    Likes Received:
    130
    Ratings:
    +167 / 4 / -4

    http://www.iraqbodycount.org/database/

    It would appear that the surge actually increased the among of violence and now it's starting to return to pre-surge levels.
  4. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,819
    Likes Received:
    144
    Ratings:
    +306 / 4 / -2

    From the website you provided.

    Deaths per day from suicide attacks and vehicle bombs (now includes non-vehicle suicide attacks)
    [​IMG]


    Deaths per day from gunfire / executions
    [​IMG]


    From www.icasualties.com

    Iraqi Deaths

  5. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,800
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Paying the sunnis stopped the violence.
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2008
  6. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,757
    Likes Received:
    130
    Ratings:
    +167 / 4 / -4

    I think the biggest impact of the surge was to help increase violence to a higher level so that when the violence returned to presurge levels, the righties would all be fooled into thinking we're winning. As they say, you can fool some of the people some of the time.
  7. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,472
    Likes Received:
    140
    Ratings:
    +293 / 0 / -3

    #75 Jersey

    1) I would like to believe you, but ljuneau is right. You didn't post any stats for 2008.
    The surge began mid 2007.

    2) Also, to those just keeping score as to only US troop casualties - - what about overall violence/casualties? What will happen when we decide that we have to save our own economy and stop paying off other nations' tribes to make nice? The minute we leave, do you actually believe there will be a pro-American government in place - - - or do we just never ever leave and spend trillions of our treasury to keep the peace inside Iraq?
  8. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,819
    Likes Received:
    144
    Ratings:
    +306 / 4 / -2

    I don't know what's more pathetic, your posts, or the fact that you actually believe what's in them.
  9. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,757
    Likes Received:
    130
    Ratings:
    +167 / 4 / -4

    The chart I posted here shows 2008 isn't all that great. Plus, they offer specifics below the chart.

    http://www.iraqbodycount.org/database/

    Yes, the surge began in 2007, but it does not appear it's made Iraq any safer than it was in early 2006. They had a surge, we had a surge. Their surge ended. Our surge ended. That does not mean the insurgents will not have another surge of their own or that they did it to distract us from Afghanistan.
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2008
  10. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,625
    Likes Received:
    67
    Ratings:
    +126 / 7 / -13


    Well there is investment flooding into the country and the Iraqi's feel they are safer, but to the dead end lefties who were hoping for an American defeat it must be very disappointing to contemplate an American victory.


    OTOH yopu don't even see that the media is in the bag for BO so you seem to left self delusion. :rolleyes:
  11. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,103
    Likes Received:
    124
    Ratings:
    +334 / 1 / -9

    Very easy to determine if the Surge Works, if the NY Times, CBS, NBC aren't talking about it, THEN IT'S WORKING.
  12. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,472
    Likes Received:
    140
    Ratings:
    +293 / 0 / -3

    #75 Jersey

    What are you talking about? We WANT it to go well.

    In fact, we are still anxiously anticipating all the Cheney-promised Iraqi oil revenues to pay for the whole adventure! It should be coming in anytime soon, right?
  13. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,386
    Likes Received:
    139
    Ratings:
    +285 / 9 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    This is just Patters' way of trying to deflect Obama's crazy statement about the surge last night.
  14. PatsFanInEaglesLand

    PatsFanInEaglesLand Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,794
    Likes Received:
    42
    Ratings:
    +85 / 6 / -9

    #37 Jersey

    Who Patters or Holy Diver?

    Both posts were F_______ S______. :banned:
  15. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,757
    Likes Received:
    130
    Ratings:
    +167 / 4 / -4

    I think you're making the assumption that if we win the war, suddenly there is no reason to oppose Bush. But, you're wrong. Let's suppose that in the next few months, Iraq achieves true peace and that all the sects come together to form a stable government.

    The questions will still remain: Was it worth $500 billion? Was it worth 4000 American lives and the lives of thousands of Iraqis? Was it worth destroying much of Iraq's infrastructure and allowing their museums to be looted? Will the country be a trustworthy ally? Will they make peace with Israel? Will they accord women at least the same rights that Saddam accorded them? Will they be able to help blunt the military gains Iran made after the fall of Saddam?

    A victory would be even be good for Obama in that if there's anything that the American people like about McCain, it's that on paper he has some better qualifications than Obama in terms of waging this war. Take the war out of the equation and focus solely on national issues and Obama becomes a stronger candidate.

    I would like to see us win in Iraq, but I think that victory is a long way off. The fact that the country and especially Baghdad is more stable is a good sign, but will that stability still hold a few months after the surge troops leave? Even General Petraeus said early on that we won't know the effectiveness of the surge because the insurgents might simply law low and wait until the surge was over.
  16. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,819
    Likes Received:
    144
    Ratings:
    +306 / 4 / -2

    Patters. The dude who someone else described as "living in a bubble".
  17. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    exactly....
  18. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,625
    Likes Received:
    67
    Ratings:
    +126 / 7 / -13



    No the question in this campaign is was the surge the right idea. BO said NO he still says NO. HE said the war is lost we should just pull out he was WRONG. H Reid, N Pelosi and the dem party said the same thing the surge couldn't succeed and that it was time to leave...THEY were WRONG.
  19. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    37,985
    Likes Received:
    282
    Ratings:
    +562 / 4 / -12

    #87 Jersey

    He's getting nervous ... if Obama fails he has Hillary for 2012 ... Obama has been the great hope since the convention in 2004.
  20. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,757
    Likes Received:
    130
    Ratings:
    +167 / 4 / -4

    Huh? I like Hillary. I could easily have supported her if she won the primaries. The biggest reason I supported Obama over her was simply that Obama ran a better campaign.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>