First off, I wasn't happy with the trades as i didn't see good value. I also wasn't happy they didn't package all the tradeable low picks for some mid rounders. Let's say, for the sense of argument, they looked at the draft and said "not a lot of difference between a low 1st and a third in this draft" and Not a lot of difference between a low third and a 5th or 6th. If that is their belief, they have 9 picks now plus probably high 1st and 3rds next year. If they get two decent players out of 9, aren't they getting similar value? Of course higher picks should be better but 2 stiffs and one asante samule still = 1 Asante Samuel. Can't decide between the fast guy with no big time experience and the slow guy with good character and competitiveness or the guy who's got it all but is a little short or light? Draft them all and let them fight it out. If we lost two decent players, but gain two by this method, we got 2 picks next year for nothing and got full value out of our low picks. Thoughts?