Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by ELOrocks17, Jan 25, 2006.
I was laughing my butt off when he exposed Diane Finestien as the radical liberal fraud she is!
Basically she was complaining that Bush is intentionally stocking the supreme court with radical conservatives. Savage pointed out that 6 of the justices are liberal leaning, and how Diane could possibly consider Aliti a conservative extremist.
Actually, ELOrocks, no one would call Justice Kennedy left, and even Souter forms his positions based on privacy issues, not on a leftwing agenda. Also, Savage was obviously including O'Connor in his count.
But for Diane to call Johnson and Alito "extremeist" while totally ignoring Ginsberg
Yes, I did catch him yesterday. He was trying to rob us of our civil liberties again. No rights for anyone, unless you can afford them.
The only "extremists" he points out are those that aren't in lock-step with the extreme right. We are all traitors in his mind for exorcising free speech.
Who is Johnson? Did you mean Roberts, perhaps?
I would order the Court like this:
Radical right: Thomas, Scalia
Liberal: Ginsburg and Stevens
I expect Alito to be radical right, and Roberts conservative, though he too might be far right.
Clinton won Republican support for Ginsburg. She was considered moderate when she was nominated, and I believe she is fairly moderate, except on social issues, where she is liberal. Souter was considered conservative, and from what I understand a case could be made that he's still conservative. He bases his decisions on the right to privacy; that's why he has come down in favor of gay rights and abortion. He's not pro-abortion, but he's against the government interfering with a woman's body.
George Bush 5
Our 2000 Election results
Did anyone catch Savage yesterday?
Are you referring to Michael Alan Weiner?
Say whatever you will at least he is not a buffet stuffing fat piece of lying crap like Ed Shultz who is paid and funded by the DNC.
You mean like that drug-abusing, thrice divorced fat piece of crap Rush Limbaugh who's funded by the RNC?
Yep...all that and he has 100 times more listeners than un-funny man Al Franken. Now there is a piece of sh*t!
How anyone can listen to that hypocritical callous buffoon is beyond rational thinking. I really don't take Al all that seriously, yet you Neo-Bots take Rush's word as gospel.
How brainwashed are you people to follow this man's hate-inspired propoganda as if it were the foundations of this society?
Do you realize what country we live in, or is it some figment of a radio shock-jocks twisted imagination that you blindly follow without question.
If only you could think for yourselves. Imagine the possibilities...........
Uh, your link proved nothing they don't agree with him so what!
What about your boy fat ass Ed who is funded by the DNC and a liar, but of course no one care because no one listens to his GARBAGE.
That's real bright...the more listeners he has, the more right he is. Friggin brilliant!
You know what? I could write "NEM is a fool" on a piece of paper. Does that mean i now have "Documented truth"?
Separate names with a comma.