http://ugv.abcnews.go.com/default.aspx?id=530841 I know many of you very much dislike both of them, but those who feel that way probably don't like any other Democratic candidate much more. From a political point of view, a Clinton-Edwards ticket would evoke youth, progress, modernity, and be highly qualified as well. Both candidates are youthful acting looking, and their records (in all honesty) are mainstream liberal on social issues and moderate on almost everything else. There are even a few key issues where they are among the conservative Democrats, such as the war and economy. The trial lawyer charge against Edwards would be nullified by the lobbyist charge against Thompson, who I think will win the Republican nomination. There really aren't many good charges against Hillary, at least no one so far has cited any substantial example, other than the Health Care fiasco, which doesn't look nearly as bad in light of today's values. Also, from articles I've read, she will likely get some significant endorsements from some of the major veterans groups in New York. I'm not endorsing this ticket, but just thinking that it would be a pretty good one. Hillary has high unfavorable's right now, but so did Reagan (who from a liberal perspective was every bit as awful as governor of California as righties think Hillary was awful as First Lady).