- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Ok, I am willing to go back to the original topic since I played a major role in derailing this thread. Brady doesn't seem to be a guy who holds a grudge with the media. He kinda rolls with the punches and knows the game. If Curran feels he has a legitimate scoop, he has to run with it even if it isn't something Brady would like or ultimately turn out to be totally false.
My ONLY problem with Curran on this issue was that he didn't handle the criticism or reports contradicting his story with the grace I would expect out of a professional. He has moved on and not maintained the immaturity he temporarilly had on the issue and gone back to being an ultimate professional. Hopefully, he has learned from this experience.
As for the story itself, I am sure most reporters would have ran with it if his source is as good as many others in the media who know who it is have attested to. Felger and Holley both vouched for his source.
Part of his Mea Culpa was that he said he should have contacted Brady or the team to give them a chance to refute or deny his information. He said that not doing that a failure on his part, but that the source he used was one he'd considered impeccable up to that point.