Terrence, for a rookie you show a lot more street smarts than a lot of the
veteran members in this forum who are calling for the trade of Asante
by draft day. With regard to Randall Gay, I think that he has a history of
injuries dating back to college. This is why he wasn't drafted. The only
way he becomes a crucial part of the team is if we lose Asante. With
regard to Asante, we can kiss our hopes for another Superbowl away
if we lose him. Payton Manning will pick us apart in the playoffs if we don't
have Asante. We have to play a waiting game with Asante and play the
odds that he will not pass up 8 million dollars and instead hold out and
lose $500,000 each regular season game day missed.
There is a very simple fact here. When we open the season in September starting at corner will either be Asante Samuel or someone who is not as good.
Point blank, that is a fact, unless someone can show me who the upgrade would be, which i doubt anyone can.
It surprises me sometimes that the consensus of this board puts more emphasis on money than talent. It is very unique for sportsfans. I guess in many ways its a good thing, because it involves thinking long term.
But what I do not understand is where is the tangible negative in signing Samuel to a long term contract that may make him one of the highest paid DBs in the NFL?
I mean, if you could show me that the $$ spent on Samuel would be better spent elsewhere, I am all ears. If you could show me that paying Samuel market value would put us in bad cap shape down the road, I would listen. But, as far as I can see this teams long term cap health is excellent, and basically, the CAN AFFORD to sign him.
Now, perhaps there is an argument such as this:
Samuel is a good corner. But whereever you would rank him at his position, we have many players ranked higher at theirs. (Seymour, Wilfork, Warren, Colvin, Thomas, Vrabel, Harrison, Light, Mankins, Watson, Koppen, Brady, Maroney (as he develops) all could be in that argument). So if you pay top dollar for Samuel, then all the others will eventually be asking top dollar and expect it.
OK. But, you cannot run a franchise that way. There is absolutely no doubt that some of those players will leave. And regardless of what happens with samuel, that wont impact it at all. Why? because the MARKET will impact it. The Pats do not operate in a vaccuum. When those players contracts are up, they will expect market value. I would argue they are MORE LIKELY to stay if you keep your best players even at a high price, because they are on a team more likely to win.
I could care less about Asante Samuels value system regarding money. I keep hearing how people are trying to assign a value system to him, and have decided for him what enough money is, and decided he is a jerk because his idea of enough money is higher than theirs.
I care about the team we put on the field in 2007, and I expect it tobe one that wins a SB. Having asante Samuel on the field gives us a better chance of winning a SB. That is the most important concern.