Welcome to PatsFans.com

Could Sanders or McGowan get a 3rd or a player?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by patsinthesnow, Mar 6, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. patsinthesnow

    patsinthesnow PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,829
    Likes Received:
    353
    Ratings:
    +666 / 15 / -6

    #87 Jersey

    One of the positions I can say we are the deepest in the league in. We have Sanders, Mcgowan, Chung, and Meriweather. One of these two could be traded for a 3rd (needed badly) or a decent player to fill one of the many holes.

    I don't know their value but is any team in dire need of a safety?
     
  2. FreeTedWilliams

    FreeTedWilliams pfadmins PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,553
    Likes Received:
    109
    Ratings:
    +304 / 38 / -4

    #75 Jersey

    The entire NFC North needs Safeties, along with our old friends the Chiefs. The Giants filled that void yesterday, but I wa thinkin the same thing (about trading McGowan/Sanders) for a third rounder, it seems reasonable.
     
  3. pats1

    pats1 Moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    13,261
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    A third? Maybe a fourth or fifth...
     
  4. efeene

    efeene Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    For all intents and purposes Boldin went for a 3rd yesterday... McGowan/Sanders are no Boldin. laaaaaaaate 4th or 5th sounds about right.. but in that case I'd just keep em.
     
  5. PatsChamp88

    PatsChamp88 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,216
    Likes Received:
    18
    Ratings:
    +68 / 3 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    No way a 3rd unless we throw in a pick too
     
  6. patsinthesnow

    patsinthesnow PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,829
    Likes Received:
    353
    Ratings:
    +666 / 15 / -6

    #87 Jersey

    I was thinking a third in context to the draft. The top 5 safeties will be gone by the start of round 3. For a team that wants to use their 1st or 2nd elsewhere to improve their team, a 3rd would get you an average starting caliber safety.

    In this draft, no 3rd round safety will be close to the impact Sanders or McGowan would have.
     
  7. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    Both of these guys are of more value to this team as depth/rotation players than any draft compensation they would net, and it likely wouldn't be more than a day 3 pick or a conditional 2011 pick. Sanders merely represents the disciplined brain and veteran leadership presence in the secondary...who needs brains and leadership...:rolleyes:
     
  8. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    21,057
    Likes Received:
    148
    Ratings:
    +395 / 33 / -5

    Perhaps we could use the pick to sign a solid backup safety that could start as needed.

    The reality is that we have four safeties which Belichick will use as is best for the team. We even have a 5th STer/S in Lockett. There is absolutely no reason to trade one of these players. The safety position arguably has the best depth on the team. Let's leave it that way.
     
  9. micronin127

    micronin127 Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    No way. They aren't even necessarily starters on this team.

    The draft is relatively deep at safety which is a low value position in this league. If Anquan Boldin is worth a 3rd....

    James Sanders might be worth a 6th. McGowan might be worth a 2011 7th rounder. We signed him off the street last year and he has probably been passed by Chung on the depth chart at safety and by Lockett and Arrington on special teams.

    McGowan = CUT (not valuable to anyone)
    Sanders = DEPTH and leadership and smarts (more valuable to us than others)

    If teams really wanted a safety they could just as easily sign any number of unrestricted free agents like Ryan Clark or Darren Sharper or Gibril Wilson or whoever and keep all their draft picks.
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2010
  10. cupofjoe1962

    cupofjoe1962 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,629
    Likes Received:
    41
    Ratings:
    +102 / 15 / -9

    I would give up Maroney for a 3rd & a dozen day old donuts.

    Then again... I would give up Maroney for just the day old donuts.

    Addition by subtraction.
     
  11. micronin127

    micronin127 Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    Maroney might be worth a 5th or 6th.

    1 year left on his deal for less than $1 million. Could be part of a committee for a team that needs a back (San Diego, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Detroit, Seattle, Minnesota, etc..).

    Maroney was a Golden Gopher and Minnesota just lost Chester Taylor who was a pass catching back... and Maroney is a good pass catching back....

    He's probably worth a 5th rounder to Minnesota.
     
  12. JFK

    JFK Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +4 / 1 / -0

    Y are you ****ting on McG?
    He has value therefore is valuable. I think he is very trade-able. Depending on how supply and demand looks after the draft, we could get a 3rd for either he or Sanders or Phony Maroney.
     
  13. micronin127

    micronin127 Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    I'll be disappointed if McGowan makes the team next year.

    Keep dreaming about a 3rd round pick though. McGowan is just a guy, 4th on the depth chart and if Springs shifts from CB to S, then McGowan is 5th on the depth chart.
     
  14. micronin127

    micronin127 Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    I am not trying to be mean to McGowan, just honest in my appraisal.

    There are at least 3 safeties available as UFA's who are better: Darren Sharper, Ryan Clark, and even Gibril Wilson. The only reason to trade for a safety is because you can't sign one. Since there is supply on the UFA market, there will be no demand for a trade for McGowan.

    The Pats could sign Ryan Clark and cut McGowan and that would be an upgrade.
     
  15. Kimimar0

    Kimimar0 On the Roster

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2010
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Kerry Rhodes a 27 year old All Pro Safety couldn't even net a 3rd, everyone knows this draft is deep and see 3rd round picks as having a lot of value. Sanders or Mcgowan arent near that value.
     
  16. kurtinelson

    kurtinelson In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +14 / 5 / -2

    #37 Jersey

    McGowan was one of the few bright spots on the defense. I'm not trying to be mean, but your honest appraisal sucks IMO.
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2010
  17. micronin127

    micronin127 Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    I'm betting you don't want to hear my honest appraisal of Dan Koppen either... he's not aging well... overmatched by Kris Jenkins, Haloti Ngata, and any other physical nose tackle in the league...

    McGowan had a few good games in the early half of the year, but down the stretch he wasn't really playing much and he would be in on 3 tackles per game on average in the last 6 games.

    He's not very physical. Not a great tackler. Not great in coverage. Had zero interceptions.

    He was able to force three fumbles so that was OK.
     
  18. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    21,057
    Likes Received:
    148
    Ratings:
    +395 / 33 / -5

    Agreed. We have four quality safeties.

     
  19. Doggin94it

    Doggin94it Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2005
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Teams generally don't trade picks for rotational players, and that's all McGowan and Sanders are; decent depth, the definition of JAGs, not stars or difference makers. Competent, and useful, but not trade bait.

    More, in this draft, their value is less than usual (because this is an unusually deep draft, which gives later round picks more value than usual). I'd be surprised if the Pats could get much more than a late 5th for either player.
     
  20. PATSYLICIOUS

    PATSYLICIOUS Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,101
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +101 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    You can never have too much depth at a position. I think we have enough picks and spending potential as it stands to address our needs for this season.
     
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2010
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>