PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Could Chad Jackson take the 81 #?


Status
Not open for further replies.

PATRIOTS-80

2nd Team Getting Their First Start
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
1,786
Reaction score
0
After all, 8 + 1 adds up to 9 just as good as 1 + 8.
 
he had number 8 in college not 9. That's why he has 17. 1 + 7 = 8. However, taking 81 is a possibility.
 
Last edited:
I don't know, 17 just seems...tighter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
drpatriot said:
I don't know, 17 just seems...tighter.

No actually 17 looks pretty ****** stupid! Way to take a number that goes to a QB. This taking stupid numbers is really getting old like Bush wanting to wear 5. WTF? This isn't college **** face! Hey Chad Jackson, take a number in the 80's...
 
17 Baby. Second tightest number on the team. Just behind 39.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL somebody has some anger issues. It's not like Chad Jackson petitioned to get #8 ala Bush. He took a number that by LEAGUE RULES is now allowed for wide receivers. You need to calm down man. 17 is TIGHT just like 39! :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top