Welcome to PatsFans.com

Could Chad Jackson take the 81 #?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by PATRIOTS-80, Jun 5, 2006.

  1. PATRIOTS-80

    PATRIOTS-80 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,786
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    After all, 8 + 1 adds up to 9 just as good as 1 + 8.
  2. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    he had number 8 in college not 9. That's why he has 17. 1 + 7 = 8. However, taking 81 is a possibility.
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2006
  3. drpatriot

    drpatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I don't know, 17 just seems...tighter.
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 16, 2005
  4. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    No actually 17 looks pretty ****** stupid! Way to take a number that goes to a QB. This taking stupid numbers is really getting old like Bush wanting to wear 5. WTF? This isn't college dick face! Hey Chad Jackson, take a number in the 80's...
  5. T-ShirtDynasty

    T-ShirtDynasty Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,562
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    17 Baby. Second tightest number on the team. Just behind 39.
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 16, 2005
  6. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +46 / 1 / -4

    LOL somebody has some anger issues. It's not like Chad Jackson petitioned to get #8 ala Bush. He took a number that by LEAGUE RULES is now allowed for wide receivers. You need to calm down man. 17 is TIGHT just like 39! :p

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>