All the pre-game noise about descension in locker room, their offensive struggles, etc etc...
The way I see it...
Jets said they were going to run the ball, and they did, and that was critical in trying to control TOP and keep Brady and the offense off the field.
Except that the seven 3 and outs, says that it didn't work..
The numbers might not dictate it, but Jets played pretty well on D, and keeping Patriots in check, and keeping the game within reach for most of the game.
If racking up a huge number of penalties is your idea of them playing well, great.
It was a game at half time, and everybody here knows it. The opening second-half drive was a killer for the Jets, a mistake by Smith in zone protection, and a hell of an effort by Revis to make a play to try and save the drive.
That pass to Branch, that was a BS call, I know you'll agree, Branch was switching hands, when contact was made, Branch didn't even have possession of the ball, that call should have never been overturned.
Learn the rules. Branch was down by contact. He was moving the ball after Pace touched him. The replays showed it perfectly. What is BS is losers like yourself and Calvin Pace attempting to claim otherwise. BTW, even if Branch didn't have possession of the ball, the Jets wouldn't have gotten it. It would have been called an incomplete pass.
The officiating once again bounced the way of the Pats, it's tiring to see the officials bail the Patriots out, and they did on several drives, while killing the Jets on a couple of their own drives.
*ROFLMAO* Sorry, but there were at least 2 other calls that the refs missed that should have gone against the Jets. And it would have negated McKnight's runback. a 4 man wedge is illegal. There was also clipping on the play. And all of the calls on the Jets were LEGIT.
Pats made some critical in game adjustments against Jets defensive packages that were designed to play the pass, additional DB's on the field, and less up front on the LOS, Pats made the adjustment and ran the ball. As I said earlier, the Pats set up the run off of their passing game, the Jets had to respect the passing game, credit to the Pats for running it and executing. Some would say they gashed the Jets run D, no, not true, because Jets didn't have their run D in many of those situations, they had their pass defensive packages on the field.
You are such a tool. The Pats were running the ball to start with. Changing up the play-calling because the Jets are stupid enough to telegraph what they are going to be doing isn't "using the pass to set up the run". The Pats run gashed the Jets defense. Period. The Jets gambled that they'd be able to stop the Pats running game and that gamble lost.
The Jets came to play, their running game showed up, and the offense showed some signs after a poor week last week. Mangold returning was huge, and immediately played dividends in the running game, and in pass protection.
You are clearly delusional. I don't call getting only 96 yards rushing "showing up to play". I don't call getting under 300 yards in offence "showing up to play".
The defense needed to make a play on that final drive, and they fell short, credit to the Pats.
It was a battle, round 1 goes to the Pats.
It's a long season, it's about who is playing the best at the end of the season.
