PromisedLand
Virtual Internet Person
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 3,367
- Reaction score
- 30
Good one, but my favorite Briticism is "lieftenant" (=lieutenant).You should check out what they've done to Aluminum
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Good one, but my favorite Briticism is "lieftenant" (=lieutenant).You should check out what they've done to Aluminum
Yeah, that's pronounced differently too "LEF-TENANT"Good one, but my favorite Briticism is "lieftenant" (=lieutenant).
Hey look at this :
"Usage Note: In American usage, a collective noun takes a singular verb when it refers to the collection considered as a whole . . . In British English, singular words like family, team, government, which refer to groups of people, can be used with either singular or plural verbs and pronouns.
* This team is/are going to lose."
Actually in almost all cases we here in the states use the team name as a plural; e.g. Patriots win. Virtually all our professional team names are plural also, e.g. Patriots, Giants, Hurricanes, or Red So[cks]x. So it makes sense that we use the plural form of the verb. Of course there are exceptions, mostly in the WNBA: Connecticut Sun, Chicago Sky and Seattle Storm come to mind, as well the NHL Tampa Bay Lightning.The thing that drove me nuts when I lived in England was how they always used the team name as a plural.
Hmmm... don't we do that here as well?
A headline should be "Arsenal Wins" as it's a singular subject but they always write "Arsenal Win". Drove me crazy - although that particular headline would be OK as that was my favorite team all those year ago.
You're right but if someone said Boston for the Red Sox they would say "Boston Wins" not "Boston Win". You are right, though, that the plural nicknames are usually used.Actually in almost all cases we here in the states use the team name as a plural; e.g. Patriots win. Virtually all our professional team names are plural also, e.g. Patriots, Giants, Hurricanes, or Red So[cks]x. So it makes sense that we use the plural form of the verb. Of course there are exceptions, mostly in the WNBA: Connecticut Sun, Chicago Sky and Seattle Storm come to mind, as well the NHL Tampa Bay Lightning.
I guess all we can conclude is that only consistent thing about English is its inconsistency!You're right but if someone said Boston for the Red Sox they would say "Boston Wins" not "Boston Win". You are right, though, that the plural nicknames are usually used.
Exactly, the American vs. British usage of a Collective Noun is differentedit: On second thought, Boston is singular, so Boston wins is also correct. In British English would you say "Boston win" because Boston is a collective noun, a city being a collection of people?
Yikes, now I see what you were talking about! That would drive me crazy too!Exactly, the American vs. British usage of a Collective Noun is different
:bricks:
Good one, but my favorite Briticism is "lieftenant" (=lieutenant).
This morning, my brother, who is a journalist from Skysports.com, interviewed Cam Cameron and Jason Taylor, as well as a couple of Dolphins officials, about the game with the Giants in October. (They are here in London for a publicity tour)
Aside from his comments that they were extremely pleasant to deal with - Taylor he found just about the most self-effacing professional athlete he has dealt with - and their genuine enthusiasm about being involved in the game, he had a couple of other comments.
First off, reading between the lines, he said that he got the impression that Cameron wasn't over optimistic that the Fins were ready to challenge in the East (although obviously he didn't say so in so many words) and that their best hope of the play-offs might be a Steelers 2005 sneak in at the last type of effort. The guy's really high on Ronnie Brown apparently and delighted to have Trent Green on board.
He asked Taylor about how he seemed to have the Indian sign over Brady, and he said he just felt that the match-ups for their D were particularly good with the Pats, and he refused to take the credit personally and said it was all about the guys around him.
I'll post the link up here when he publishes his piece in the next few days.
Yeah, thanks to Benny Hill and Mr. Bean
Yup very polite soccer fans:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/soccer/world/2000/euro2000/news/2000/06/17/brussels_riots_ap/
I doubt it.
Bring a Manchester United - Liverpool "football" game over here and see what a long lasting effect it has . . . not.
Don't you like our less slapstick stuff, like the Office, Little Britain and so on?
That makes my point even more valid, I think. If I saw the soccer game it might peak my interest - Hurling ? I'd have a few beers while watching and leave saying "that was a funny game".
You should check out what they've done to Aluminum