- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,108
- Reaction score
- 52,116
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.27/49, 377 yards, 0 TD, 4 INT
46.0 Passer Rating
Still think Brady was horrible last week?
27/49, 377 yards, 0 TD, 4 INT
46.0 Passer Rating
Still think Brady was horrible last week?
It shouldn't have been all on Brady. Those teams D kept them in the game. Rodgers and Roth only had to do enough. Can't blame all on Brady but neither should Brady be absolved, given that his MVP performance (deservedly so) in the regular season was what brought the team to this point. He could have done better.
Since when the Pats became one-man team? (if that one guy didn't do well, the team was doomed). There used to be a one-man team also in superbowl, led by No #7 in Mile High. That team got blown out in both SBs. One was good enough to erased the Pats 46-10 ignominious record. Would we want the Pats heading the same direction?
I think BB said "stats are for losers".