VJCPatriot
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 16,663
- Reaction score
- 5,239
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think Laurinitis just dropped himself to round 2.
I see Barwin and Sidbury as risers.
I would say that this is pretty darn accurate as to what I saw, with a few minor quibbles. Laurinaitis looked smooth and good in the drills compared to how he ran (and for the record, I am NOT a Laurinaitis fan). I'm not sure I liked Worrell Williams as much as you, and Phillips looked ok but not great. Gerald McRath looked very smooth but he's too light to be of interest to us.
The most interesting thing I saw was the old film of Mayo from last year. He looked even better than Curry, albeit for only 1 drill. And faster too, though not as big or powerful.
Right now, I'd be thrilled with something like Beatty or a top corner at 23, Barwin/Sintim with a move up from 47, Gilbert or Brace at 58 and Brinkley in the 4th.
You are thinking this based on a combine? An entire career of game film is worth less than a combine position drill result?
Anyone who thinks Brinkley will last past 3 or 4 rounds is crazy after the way he played today.
He's a good football player first, who plays the position well. He doesn't have to impress here at the Combine to get drafted by the Pats. Perspective is certainly needed forum-wide.Beckwith looked awful, doubly so for a guy who supposedly was athletic and fast but lacking size
He's a good football player first, who plays the position well. He doesn't have to impress here at the Combine to get drafted by the Pats. Perspective is certainly needed forum-wide.
Anyone who thinks Brinkley will last past 3 or 4 rounds is crazy after the way he played today.
Fortunately the Pats draft players from actual game films -- not from Combine drills. Brinkley is actually better than some here have given him credit for. The drills don't make or break a player, they're just part of the equation.
Sintim with a 4.78
Except that he's small and slow and didn't play so well his senior season. I highly doubt he gets drafted by the Patriots for a multitude of reasons, and my perspective is fine, thanks.
The fact is, this draft is light on legitimate MLB's. Brinkley once showed a lot of football ability, early in his SEC career. Injuries and too much weight made a lot of people, including myself, question his change of direction and top-end speed.
He is certainly rising up OTHER teams draft boards rather quickly based on his performance, and PROVEN POTENTIAL (pre-injury).
Yes, and would you like to know which Pats draft picks had the top numbers at their respective Combines?Also, don't doubt the importance of the combine, as most of our recent LB and CB pickups have shown extremely good speed/quickness for their respective position.
Might Maualuga slide to 23 if he cannot do anything till pro day? I don't really know how much NFL scouts put into these last couple of weeks
If he has a bad pro day too... then yeah. But then, why would we want him?
Why didn't you elaborate this way the first time? Makes more sense than just critiquing a drill -- no?
I'll be rewatching the NFL Network DL/LB Combine rebroadcast, but I've got to jump in here and vote "nothing before round 5 on Brinkley!" I've read all the love he's received from fans over the past 3 years and I don't see it. The guy may have been a stud out there today, but put him in pads and he's looking for a clue. Jays gave me props for liking Barwin, well Barwin caught my eye because he had a nose for the football, everytime I watched South Carolina Brinkley struggled finding the football and he actually looked more athletic "after" his knee injury. If you want to lobby for a Gamecokk, choose a receiver.
.....If you want to lobby for a Gamecokk, choose a receiver.
Amongst others.actually, the guy you 'liked' all along was sintim........