- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 5,511
- Reaction score
- 2,299
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Miguel said:They just released Jose Cortez ($585,000 salary) so in effect Adam took his spot among the Top 51 list. So the net cap cost to the Colts to add Adam to their roster is $1,095,000 ($1,680,000 (Adam's cap number minus $585,000).
spacecrime said:I'm less impressed by bragging about how low the first year of a contract is.
Where exactly did I say that?? When did I say that?? Please criticize my posts for what they actually contain. Please do not put words in my mouth.Taking a three or five year contract, and saying it is a good one because one year is made artificially low by jacking up the others is disengenuous at best.
The cost of a player per year is the money you paid him divided by the years you had him. Just like my VISA card. I can charge it, but eventually I must pay.
Miguel said:You call it bragging. I called it reporting.
Where exactly did I say that?? When did I say that?? Please criticize my posts for what they actually contain. Please do not put words in my mouth.
Adam's deal is a good deal for the Colts, period. They got the best clutch kicker in the game at a very reasonable price.
You didn't say any of that stuff and I never said you did. Chill out, man. I can post on topic and it could just be about the topic and not about you.Miguel said:You call it bragging. I called it reporting.
Where exactly did I say that?? When did I say that?? Please criticize my posts for what they actually contain. Please do not put words in my mouth.
Adam's deal is a good deal for the Colts, period. They got the best clutch kicker in the game at a very reasonable price.
Miguel said:Adam's deal is a good deal for the Colts, period.
oldrover said:Ah, crap. So the Colts signed Adam AND helped their cap number?!?!?! Sucking sucking super sucking suckitude of the suckliest sucking suckrement.
There's pluses and minuses..I agree no one wanted him to leave..but things happen..AV got his money, the Dolts got a bargain and the Patriots will move on.PATRIOTS-80 said:It will be hard for Adam to beat Vanderjerk's # in the regular season. Perhaps it will make a difference in the playoffs. But with Manning's protection issues it shouldn't make a difference at all.
Nobody really wanted Adam to leave, he's a good kicker, but as they say, "all good things must come to an end." Furthermore, at age 34, I think the Pats got the best ten years out of Adam. The Colts' advantage is he will be kicking from turf in the twilight years of his career.
Like in any strategic game (like chess for example) if you lose something, there is always something that you can do to partially offset the loss. For example, we could draft the OSU kicker, and he could do better on KO. That could give the defense potentially 5 more of yards of field position. The new kicker could be able to kick longer FG.
Shhh... rumor is we're saving the cap room to sign Diet Mountain Dew Machine. It's got a hell of a lot more pep than last years Diet Pepsi Machine, younger, and after prodution fell off last year, is really looking to make the most of it's second chance.PATRIOTS-80 said:yeah, this year. But they aren't going to get away from making him the highest paid kicker. BB will find good use for Adam's $ he had allocated. I am sure of it.
T-ShirtDynasty said:Shhh... rumor is we're saving the cap room to sign Diet Mountain Dew Machine. It's got a hell of a lot more pep than last years Diet Pepsi Machine, younger, and after prodution fell off last year, is really looking to make the most of it's second chance.
A bargain for the Clots..a lousy deal for AV??? NaaaaaRayClay said:I guess his agent didn't do a good job.
Maybe he should have kept his old one. (regular happy face smiley).