Your ignorance seems to have no limits along with your bigotry.{/quote]
Insult the other person, throw out a strawman. You have this down to a sscience.
I cannot even begin to start breaking down the stupidity, ignorance, and arrogance with which the bolded statement was written.
Go ahead and try. So far all you have is, when faced with something you cannot respond effectively to, is to call me stupid. Brilliant debate tactic you have there.
So you are an expert on "underdeveloped country law"....lol. Really, where do you get your degree from?
I need a degree to understand that the laws of underdeveloped countries are, umm, underdeveloped?
Answer this for me (I know you won't because it proves you wrong, so you will end up calling me stupid, changing it or avoiding it altogether)
Do you believe the laws in third world countries are as accurate a representation of the beliefs and wishes of their population as the laws of developed democratic countries?
I bet if I could sit u down right now and take u away from google, I'd bet you'd have trouble naming 10 Supreme Court decisions nevermind understanding them.
Another combo personal attack and strawman, which seems to be all you have.
Please explain what this comment has to do with this conversation. Where do Supreme Court decisions apply? And of course you wild guess attempt at an insult is wrong.
If you honestly think that laws in this country are "well studied" and "investigated" then you are blind.
So you feel less study and investigation goes into law making in the USA than in 3rd world countries?
You are embarrassing yourself.
Take a look at the Corwin Amendment and you tell me that was "well studied" and "investigated". I could go on for days on all the bad laws that were passed to this very day. Obamacare....."well studied" and "investigated" when it was passed????? Unbelievable.
The Corwin Amendment is law? I must have missed that. Of course it was written and rejected 150 years ago, so that seems very relevant to a comparison of 21st century laws in developed vs underdeveloped countries.
Regardless of your obvious lame attempt at finding examples, please explain how citing laws you find poor to be proof that undeveloped countries are more in tune with the beliefis of their citizens, more up to date in their law making and study and investigate these issues more thoroughly.
Of course we all know you will avoid that and insult me instead. How Catholic is that?