- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 58,968
- Reaction score
- 12,732
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Salsbury in his book says Clayton bangs more grade A trim than anyone would believe.
Salsbury in his book says Clayton bangs more grade A trim than anyone would believe.
Salsbury in his book says Clayton bangs more grade A trim than anyone would believe.
That sentence makes me want to vomit.
Tate, Aiken, Edelman, or Nunn cannot be relied upon as a third receiver at this point. This is an obvious weakness for the Patriots, and they aren't gonig to just sit on it.
Tate, Aiken, Edelman, or Nunn cannot be relied upon as a third receiver at this point. This is an obvious weakness for the Patriots, and they aren't gonig to just sit on it.
What makes you believe this? From where I stand, the Pats cut Galloway because they feel that Tate and Edelman can be more effective in the passing game as the 3rd receiver than Galloway was.
Salsbury in his book says Clayton bangs more grade A trim than anyone would believe.
maybe they deal with the eagles again. kevin curtis or reggie brown
I know. Who read a book by Sean Salisbury?
I think Endlemen is doing alright as the third option....but I see your point. You need deeper threat....a Gaffney type
What makes you believe this? From where I stand, the Pats cut Galloway because they feel that Tate and Edelman can be more effective in the passing game as the 3rd receiver than Galloway was.
People don't think that the Patriots are desperate for an outside receiver to pair with Moss?
Seriously?
After 6 weeks, people here honestly don't see that enormous hole in the offense?
This just in: A photo of Bill Belichick frantic:
I actually think it's perfectly likely that the Pats are making calls, but the "frantic" bit is pretty comical.