- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 15,208
- Reaction score
- 12,977
Wow...this is exactly the way I see it too, with a possible trade upwards for J Long.
Oh no! Then what will we argue about for the next month?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Wow...this is exactly the way I see it too, with a possible trade upwards for J Long.
Oh no! Then what will we argue about for the next month?
I'm with you almost every step of the way. It's just that, if we can't trade the pick and Long, Long, Gholston and Clady are gone, I'll go with Leodis McKelvin over Groves and be content that I was fortunate enough to get the next great Trojan (proper trojan - one who hails from Troy).
That way I don't have to rely on finding a trading partner in the early second to land Cason or Flowers or Porter.
I reckon which quarterback to draft as a late round prospect. Sam Keller in the sixth?
Ooh, nice time waster! Gutierrez was such my binky last year that I'm tempted to rest on my laurels, but I'll poke around....
The entire OL (even Mankins) laid an egg. Drafting Clady upgrades the group, but by itself doesn't make the Pats immune to a collective hairball coughed up by the OL during the playoffs.
....
If you don't like the defensive options at #7, how about trading down and selecting DRC or Talib at a more reasonable pricetag? Mayo or Lofton can be added later and the results are similar. The added benefit of not having to hear about the "elderly" Pats defense every week makes it all the better.
For what it's worth Drafttek has the Patriots trading down with the Bears so they can take Ryan. We would get the Bears #14 and #45.
I don't know how plausable that would be but the math works according to the draft trade value chart.