Welcome to PatsFans.com

China Solar Makers Face ‘Suicidal’ Prices on Excess Output

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by patsfan13, Nov 26, 2011.

  1. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,555
    Likes Received:
    163
    Ratings:
    +441 / 11 / -14

    China Solar Makers Face ‘Suicidal’ Prices on Excess Output - Businessweek



    Commentary on the State of the Chinese Solar Industry which was being touted here in the US as the Green Economy of the future. Some here have consistently said that this is not a viable source of large scale industries government subsidies notwithstanding.

    New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard

     
  2. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,555
    Likes Received:
    163
    Ratings:
    +441 / 11 / -14

    So continuing on the theme of 'renewable' energy and why it doesn't work in the real world....


    From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist:

    The myth of renewable energy | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

     
  3. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,555
    Likes Received:
    163
    Ratings:
    +441 / 11 / -14

    And this about tens of thousands abandoned wind turbines littering America:

     
  4. Ilikehappyppl

    Ilikehappyppl 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    So when the oil runs out then what?

    If you can answer this, you could be a very rich man....

    Way I look at it, we better find another source of energy or we are all ****ed! The oil and the coal is gonna be gone someday, then what?

    I keep hearing solar is not efficient enough but just a few days ago a 13 year old kid figured out how to get more efficiency for solar panels just through design. We have to keep working at it, someday maybe we can get 80-90% efficiency through better design and better panels.

    As for wind, same thing we need better design and better efficiency but that costs money and R&D, we have to keep going forward!

    So unless you can tell me how to make oil or coal out of sand or dirt or water ( our most abundant resources) then you need to start thinking about tomorrow instead of today, because sometime maybe not next year maybe not in 10 years but someday the oil and the coal is gonna run out and we can't afford to sit around and do nothing about it!

    Plus we can kill two birds with one stone here, we get rid of or at least lower our consumption of oil and coal we can help our environment too, now does it really matter if burning oil or coal makes global warming? I don't like smog and I like clean air, do you like clean air? do you like breathing in dirty air?

    So what's your plan when the oil are coal runs out?:cool:
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2011
  5. scout

    scout Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    30
    Ratings:
    +51 / 0 / -2

    #15 Jersey

    Yet, small businesses keep installing these wind turbines as they think it saves them money. We need to stop thinking of options to to fossil fuels. Pffffffft, next thing you know we'll be saying we'll send a man to the moon within the next decade.
     
  6. Titus Pullo

    Titus Pullo Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -1

    He has none.

    Leave it to 13 to create false dichotomies and then squawk, "see? told ya!"

    No one said renewables would provide what fossil fuels currently provide. That's not really the point. The point is that it's essential we fill the ever-widening gap. Hydrocarbons ARE currently failing to meet demand, and a day will come - very soon - that we rue not building renewable infrastructure when we had the capital to do so.

    Growth is over. People had better start reprogramming that things can or will ever go back to the way they were.

    Again, you can tell me that you've found a trillion barrels of conventional crude behind the moon, but that doesn't make it economically viable to get to it. If it costs more to extract, refine and distribute it than it provides, you're not sustaining growth.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2011
  7. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    43,111
    Likes Received:
    317
    Ratings:
    +807 / 26 / -33

    Same old, same old.. someone should tell the author of this thread how improper it is to pimp your own thread..

    The reality is that the US is lagging behind countries like Spain, Germany and Japan in solar panel installation.. and no matter how many times it has been explained to this author of this thread, it takes time to offset the intial purchase and installation costs before a profit is turned.. it takes time to offset the costs, whether it be Nuclear, Coal, Oil or Solar..

    Now there is a trend to rent the panels instead of buying them, like we do for cable tv...

    http://go.solarcity.com/campaigns/2...cov85580s6f76a4a4-d76f-3c69-63ed-0000646deced

    The underlying belief that if you tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth is never more evident than it is here..
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2011
  8. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,555
    Likes Received:
    163
    Ratings:
    +441 / 11 / -14




    You wouldn't know the truth or lie when it relates to a technical subject due to your abysmal ignorance of all things technical.

    You just mindlessly parrot things from left wing blogs you don't understand.



    Now perhaps in the wake of Fukishima the Japanese will attempt to impoverish themselves instead of shutting down their Gen 1 &2 Nuclear plants and moving to Gen 3 Plants which don't need active cooling system to be safe.
    but the cost will be ~10 times the cost of electricily from Coal or Nuclear:

    A Solar Future? Prospects, Problems, and Japan?s Solar Energy Plans???????????????????????????????? :: JapanFocus


    Then in Germany taxes to subsidize an ineffective energy source:


    more on the failure in Germany here:
    Solar PV has failed in Germany and it will fail in the UK | George Monbiot | Environment | guardian.co.uk

    Of course the Spanish are on edge of default and their 'solar economy' is collapsing because they can no longer finance the lavish subsidies for expensive solar power:

    Spain's Solar Deals on Edge of Bankruptcy as Subsidies Founder - Bloomberg
     
  9. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,555
    Likes Received:
    163
    Ratings:
    +441 / 11 / -14

    What is 'saving' them money are taxpayers subsidies. The true cost is hidden by the government subsidies...
     
  10. Ilikehappyppl

    Ilikehappyppl 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Pats13

    So what's your plan when the oil are coal runs out?

    You talk about cost but what happens when we don't have anymore oil and coal? Its gonna cost us then, so why just not do it now?

    What's your end game? Yes we all know coal and oil are cheaper but what happens when they run out? We are gonna have to eat the cost someday anyways....
     
  11. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,555
    Likes Received:
    163
    Ratings:
    +441 / 11 / -14


    The fundamental issue with Solar and Wind energy is their intermittent nature and the old term 'energy density', these are physical limitations which cannot be overcome, even when the technology is 'perfected'. See the links from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientist in the first post and this link :

    http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm?aid=2469



    We should invest in technologies that can succeed not in technologies that will always be insufficient.

    Thorium reactors should be developed these should be supplemented by Third and fourth generation breeder reactors, with a ratio of ~10 thorium to 1 Breeder reactor, this will reduce the amount of nuclear reactor. This would be a sufficient source of electricity until fusion reactors become commercially feasible.


    We should use these technologies to phase out coal and the first and second generation nuclear reactors.

    http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/energy/nuclear/is-thorium-the-nuclear-fuel-of-the-future

    http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf62.html

    http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/348/


    The rare earth elements needed for Solar and Wind are very toxic and coal plants are being built that produce very little particulate matter. So the differences aren't nearly as great as you might believe.
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2011
  12. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,555
    Likes Received:
    163
    Ratings:
    +441 / 11 / -14


    We have enough coal and oil for a few hundred years. So there is no need to impoverish ourselves in the meantime with technologies that are inherently costly.
     
  13. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,586
    Likes Received:
    173
    Ratings:
    +418 / 8 / -4

    You're back to your all or nothing standard, I see. :rolleyes:
     
  14. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,586
    Likes Received:
    173
    Ratings:
    +418 / 8 / -4

    What is the "true cost" of oil?
     
  15. Titus Pullo

    Titus Pullo Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -1

    Fail.

    I can't tell if you're lying, or just not very smart. Either way, it's absolutely amazing how often you willfully keep coming back to a topic that you quite clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
     
  16. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    43,111
    Likes Received:
    317
    Ratings:
    +807 / 26 / -33

    You repeat the same lie over and over, and it is still not believable.

    All energy technologies are costly initially, and they are conceptualized to make money over the long run whether it be Solar, wind, Nuclear or conventional. There is tremendous capitol needed to build and put any energy facility on line.

    You should be very concerned as is memory serves me correctly you live in the Delaware River Wathershed, and up river there is serious hydrofracking going on by irresponsible companies who were and are protected by Darth Cheney. This action potentially could effect the drinking water of the 26 million people who live between NYC and Philadelphia..

    Check the impact on Dimock, Penn or Dish, Texas... the incidents are not isolated and also take place in Wyoming and Colorado. To make it worse the 2005 Energy act exempts the Hyrdrofracking industry from divulging what they use to extract gas from the earth, known as the Haliburton Rule. Aside from this they use millions of gallons of water that is injected back into the earth that can never be used again.. these are the costs that cannot be factored.

    Clean burning gas is a lie..

    We all do live downstream...
     
  17. Wolfpack

    Wolfpack Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    9,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Well I can safely, 100% guarantee you we won't be sending a man to the moon in the next decade, so I'm not entirely sure your point.
     
  18. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,938
    Likes Received:
    302
    Ratings:
    +557 / 22 / -19

    PF13, as the article you quoted about the limitations of solar and wind energy states, "There is no technology for storing commercial quantities of electricity. Until something is developed – which seems unlikely – wind and solar can serve only as intermittent, unpredictable resources."

    Clearly, this is something that is being heavily explored from two angles -- better batteries and more efficient products. As we make strides in both of those areas, our need for energy could actually decrease, making nonthreatening, nonpolluting solutions more realistic. Your Malthusian thinking with regard to this issue sort seems to run against your thinking on other issue. In another thread you accused someone of Malthusian thinking because they questioned how big the oil reserves are; you seem to be questioning the possibility of technological developments making solar and wind power more viable when in fact there have been enormous technical developments in terms of efficiency and significant ones in terms of energy storage.
     
  19. scout

    scout Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    30
    Ratings:
    +51 / 0 / -2

    #15 Jersey

    Looking back at that statement by JFK, we think how dramatic it was. At that time, it was fairly inconceivable. The computers that we are using to post on this site are exponentially more powerful then what was in that mooned flight. I would imagine that there were many critics who scoffed at such a statement, but probably quite a few who believed in American ingenuity and that impossible was not relative.
    Today, when an individual or group states that we can harness the wind and use that for our energy needs, I tend to find value that statement. I also know that a bulk of the critics have a vested interests in wind energy not happening.
    Thus, my statement concerning "putting a man on the moon within the next decade".
     
  20. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,401
    Likes Received:
    399
    Ratings:
    +766 / 14 / -6

    #24 Jersey

    That's like saying that as long as we keep doing what we're doing we'll have enough people in the world for a few hundred years. So there is no need to impoverish our women by making them carry unwanted pregnancies in the meantime with babies that are inherently costly.

    What happens in "a few hundred years," when that coal and oil runs out? Do we just not give a dam about the people who come after us? Do we ignore all biblical commands to care for the earth? Do we deny our stewardship of the earth's resources because - well because we don't want to spend the money?
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>