Welcome to PatsFans.com

CHFF: Fascinating stat on Patriots Defense

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Bertil, Jan 24, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bertil

    Bertil Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    966
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Captain Comeback: Special Mistakes Set Up Super Rematch | Cold Hard Football Facts

    "The New England Patriots are the only defense in the league to never allow more than 27 points in any game this season (including playoffs).

    A few caveats: this is all about points allowed by the defense. Buffalo scored 34, but 7 were the result of a pick six thrown Brady. The Patriots allowed 27 twice on defense (Buffalo, Washington), which is their “minmax” this year."

    Who would've guessed? This is certainly a different perspective. Now in the playoffs, that number is in the 15 point range. Hardly a scientific sample, I know. Let's hope this trend continues.

    This site is always an interesting source of information, not found anywhere else. Then again, you can hardly expect the Pete Prisco's of the world to do anything remotely analytical. You get to hear what "Supercharged" Offense is playing "Light's Out" or who is "Taking his game to the Next Level". Yeah...uh, thanks there, Petey.
  2. IllegalContact

    IllegalContact On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    10,888
    Likes Received:
    143
    Ratings:
    +296 / 4 / -9

    who knew that shooting for mediocrity could wind up being so rewarding.


    good stuff.....here's to vince wilfork ripping chris snee's head off
  3. PatsSox363804

    PatsSox363804 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    That's why I laugh when people say the Giants are putting up 35. Not that they can't do it there's just no basis for it this season especially since we already played them once and it took 2 pass interference calls, 4 turnovers, and key injuries in game for them to get to 24.
  4. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,661
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -13

    Note that Captain Comeback is a mouth-frothing Brady hater when he posts on KFFL (aka Still No Life).
  5. Gwedd

    Gwedd PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,978
    Likes Received:
    62
    Ratings:
    +116 / 0 / -1

    #61 Jersey

    Fencer said:
    Man, try saying THAT phrase 10 times in a row. That's a real tongue-tangler. :eek:
  6. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,054
    Likes Received:
    114
    Ratings:
    +198 / 7 / -23

    Agree with your assessment of CHFF, but must admit that there are times I do not understand them.
  7. letekro

    letekro Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,162
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +8 / 2 / -3

    Let's not forget that 1. Nicks did not play 2. Cruz was not the star then that he has become 3. Bradshaw did not play 4. the Giants and Eli are playing much better now than they were around the middle of the season.
  8. BSR

    BSR Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -0

    That guy is still there? I thought he disappeared in 2007 when Brady's historic season was crushing all of his stupid anti-Brady rhetoric. I left that board midway through the season as I couldn't stand the vitriol and garbage. I guess he returned.
  9. PatsSox363804

    PatsSox363804 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Yeah? So are we. We turned the ball over 4 frigging times that game and didnt give up 30 points.

    Look the Giants are a great team, they can win this game and should probably be favored. But I'm getting really tired of them being treated like the 85 Bears and most of that stems from this fan bases perception that if the 07 team lost to them then there's no way this 11 team can beat them. Screw that. That team can be beat. This team which hasnt lost by double digits all season will not get steam rolled like I'm reading on some boards like SOSH. This fan base needs to sack the hell up.
  10. Patradomous

    Patradomous Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,975
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +78 / 0 / -9

    #87 Jersey

    This is the most amazing stat I heard last night on sportcentral and I think it bodes well for the Pats going forward and speaks to their resiliance.

    Playoff teams that give up 2+ turnovers and 50 yards more offense to the opposition. Are 2-110 That would be Green Bay and our Patriots the only team to pull that off.
  11. Phokus

    Phokus Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think we have to look at points per drive. I imagine that the Patriots offense gives the patriots a higher time of posession (and thus fewer opportunities for the other team's offense to score) as well as the fact that the other team is usually playing from behind, thus it limits their playbook some.
  12. letekro

    letekro Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,162
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +8 / 2 / -3

    I think it will be a great game, but the Giants offense is more than capable of putting up 30 if we don't take advantage of Eli's hail marys. Of course, our offense is too, if we don't turn it over.
  13. SeymourTrophies

    SeymourTrophies Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #93 Jersey

    Agreed, but at the same time, Sergio Brown did play, and AHern hadn't fully recovered until early December. No doubt Nicks, Ballard, and Cruz will have their moments, but at that point in the season, our front seven wasn't anywhere near what it is now. The Pats have also played some solid front sevens the last two games, and aside from Suggs skinning Solder alive one time, the line has held firm.

    The issue with the Giants is that they were 9-7 for a reason. They could blow us out by 20 points or get blown out by 30 points depending on which team shows up.
  14. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,661
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -13

    Absolutely. His current screen name is Still_Swinging.

    He just posted that he predicted before the game that Pollard would injure Gronkowski, and now he wants to get Pollard's autograph.
  15. PatsDeb

    PatsDeb PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,000
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +40 / 0 / -1

    A nice read, but I can't forget that last week CHFF predicted a Pats loss based on the oft repeated mantra that we hadn't beaten anyone with a winning record in the regular season and therefore would not beat Baltimore.
  16. patsfaninpittsburgh

    patsfaninpittsburgh Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,055
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Huh?

    When the Giants won that game, it put them at 6-2. Their losing streak started right after that.

    It's amazing how a Hail Mary and a 15 yards crossing pattern against a keystone cops secondary grows the legend. The reality is for the vast majority of the year, Nicks has been a butter finger/alligator arm receiver.

    Ahh, yeah, Cruz was the "star" he is now.
  17. ewg_gestalt

    ewg_gestalt Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Well, in the playoffs, not counting kneel-drives, the Broncos had 12 drives for 10 points, and the Ravens had 11 drives for 20 points. That's a total of 23 drives for 30 points, or about 1.30 points per drive (0.83 against the Broncos, and 1.81 against the Ravens).

    On the season as a whole, that stat's probably not too shabby, either, since the nature of the offense gives opposing offenses a lot of drives to respond.
  18. BSR

    BSR Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -0

    Actually the long drives by the Patriots offense reduces the number of drives opposing offenses have to respond. I think the Patriots D faced the fourth fewest opposing drives.
  19. patfanken

    patfanken On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,705
    Likes Received:
    246
    Ratings:
    +428 / 13 / -8

    #91 Jersey

    Lets not forget that 1. the Pat lost BOTH their starting safeties DURING the game (the worst time). and was down to their 3rd C and 2nd RT. 2 actually you are wrong in your 3rd point, because Cruz's production was consistent throughout the year. Its not like he got better after this game. 3. you are also wrong in your 4th point. The Giants came into that game one a roll and it was AFTER this game that they took their dip.

    The Giants have a better running game with Bradshaw than without him. But think about this. He isn't nearly as good as Ray Rice who was controlled by the Pats, and if you wanted to pick a Giant player most likely to turn the ball over, even Giants fans would pick Ahmad Bradshaw.
  20. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,512
    Likes Received:
    270
    Ratings:
    +603 / 6 / -0

    Agreed, I have absolutely no gut feeling about how this game will go. The Giants are extremely talented but extremely inconsistent; the Patriots defense is just settling into a stable identity; the Patriots' weakness in the defensive backfield is a tough matchup with the Giants' strength at WR; the Giants' weakness in the interior OL is a tough matchup with the Patriots' strength up front....

    In short, anybody who feels confident about how this game will go must have one heck of a crystal ball.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>