- Joined
- Dec 23, 2004
- Messages
- 5,250
- Reaction score
- 877
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's looking that way. Or they could have agreed but Givens (or his agent) pulled out when the leak happened. Who knows.Kdo5 said:Givens was not signed, it was false. He's meeting with the Dolphins though.
MoLewisrocks said:What makes you think the Colts are over the cap?
I know the new Manning and Harrison deals went away, but before those the Colts were $6-7M over. The new CBA added $7.5M. And it also added a 5th pro-ration year to the deals the Colts signed with Brock and Brackett. They gave a couple of more players low tenders so all in all they are likely $1M+ under before they convert Peyton and Marvin's roster bonuses to signing bonus (which if they do both would free up almost $14M in cap space).
FYI in an interview published on Coltspower Polian is saying they have "around $8M".
Willie55 said:
Miguel said:That report was for noon yesterday. The Colts had until 11:59 PM yesterday to get under the cap.
Willie55 said:Have they made any moves or restructurings since then?
Willie55 said:Have they made any moves or restructurings since then?
Actually, it was up on the Browsn web site before midnight....there is an image captured and produced at PFT with the article FROM the site..Tampering?? Bentley as well had a deal signed and because of the NFL looking into it..taken back. I think the NFL should look into these charges and see if anything occured. Been ahappening a lot these last years..Kdo5 said:Givens was not signed, it was false. He's meeting with the Dolphins though.
workhorse said:They did according to Polian. They restuctured to spread the bonuses out over 5 years, instead of 4 years, with the new CBA.
Pats726 said:Actually, it was up on the Browsn web site before midnight....there is an image captured and produced at PFT with the article FROM the site..Tampering?? Bentley as well had a deal signed and because of the NFL looking into it..taken back. I think the NFL should look into these charges and see if anything occured. Been ahappening a lot these last years..
if it is not allowed...clamp down and fine teams that do that. If they are NOT going to do that..then..why have a start date like that?? ALlow talks before out in the open. I agree that some teams cheat a great deal..if TBu wishes to keep it from getting worse, investigate these and other complaints and do something so it does NOT happen.
http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
workhorse said:I read somewhere, I can't recall where, that they were looking into potential site hacking of the Browns' site. I guess there was a report that listed a couple free agent signings that hadn't happened. I don't know if it's legit or a cover though.