manxman2601
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 30,077
- Reaction score
- 25,532
What value? The value of having TWO picks, rather than ONE. Especially when there's a strong likelihood that one of those picks (27, 31) will probably be traded down for yet another free pick, and another 1st rounder next yr. That's one of the ways that Belichick continues to put this team in position to win not only now, but also in the future too.
You may agree or disagree, but at this point is seems pretty apparent that Belichick tends to see value in physically taking more players, thus increasing his odds at hitting on decent draft talent. It's particularly brilliant when you have several rebuilding needs all at once, as we did in the yrs of 2009-2010, when the front office took 24 picks in those two years. One could debate back and forth whether or not there is still any type of rebuilding phase going on at defense right now.
You may not agree with the 'front 7' mentality, but there are more holes at DT, DE, and OLB than there are at safety...especially if Belichick is planning on using one of Gregory, Moore, Allen, or McCourty (at times in subs) and/or drafting someone in the first 3-4 rounds. The safety position can be addressed much easier than the building of all 3 of those front seven positions that I listed.
It seems as though you really like Mark Barron, and although I don't necesarily agree due to the fact that he's the 'best' in a terribly weak draft class, you may very well be right. Maybe he is one of the high impact players of the draft, I am not questioning your talent assessments.
I do believe that Belichick would not trade 2 of our higher draft picks for the opportunity to draft Mark Barron, but of course that is just my opinion.
I take your point on having extra picks, particularly in respect of being able to trade them forward but as I see it, ultimately the draft is about putting together the best team possible, not about accumulating picks. Now BB has taken the view that trading forward is the best way to improve the team and I normally agree with this approach but there are times when that perfect player comes along and I see Barron in that way. and i'm not just talking about ability here. It's his intangibles that won me over. He directs the Alabama secondary and Nick Saban gave him the responsibility to do that which speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned. BB likes smart players and I believe Barron is the ideal BB guy.
Hopefully Curran and I are right but we shall see on the day. I think it's unlikely we'll trade up that far for him but I shall keep my fingers crossed nevertheless. One thing I'm sure of. If he is the pick, he'll win you round.