Welcome to PatsFans.com

Censorship, White House style

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by PressCoverage, Dec 22, 2006.

  1. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Former Bush Official: CIA Censored Op-Ed Because It Was Forced To ‘Bow To The White House’

    Middle East analyst Flynt Leverett, who served under President Bush on the National Security Council and is now a fellow at the New America Foundation, revealed last week that the White House has been blocking the publication of an op-ed he wrote for the New York Times. The column is critical of the administration’s refusal to engage Iran.

    Leverett’s op-ed had been cleared by the CIA, where he had been a senior analyst. Today in an op-ed for the New York Times, Levrett explains more:

    [The] Op-Ed article we wrote for The Times, [was] blacked out by the Central Intelligence Agency’s Publication Review Board after the White House intervened in the normal prepublication review process and demanded substantial deletions. Agency officials told us that they had concluded on their own that the original draft included no classified material, but that they had to bow to the White House.

    The redacted version of Leverett’s original op-ed is here (and pictured above). He has provided his original citations “to demonstrate that all of the material the White House objected to is already in the public domain.” All of the citations Leverett provides are available online from newspapers, think tanks, and government websites.

    Last week at the Center for American Progress, Leverett noted that this incident shows “just how low people like Elliot Abrams at the NSC [National Security Council] will stoop to try and limit the dissemination of arguments critical of the administration’s policy.” (Hear his remarks here.)
     
  2. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    i love when irrelevant, antagonistic posts like this receive such little attention they drop to page 2 within hours... i almost feel bad for the effort...

    thus... *bump*

    still doubtful, but maybe this time someone will actually give a chit...
     
  3. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    so you're so void of original material, you're using your opponents'? lol...

    anyhow, i'll challenge you and see if you have anything to truly offer on the subject (hopefully you'll address the issue, and not deflect to Clinton): almost everyone advocates talks with Iran and Syria... well, except for the geniuses in the Bush League... what is the point of censoring that position, especially when it's all quite public knowledge and the CIA has signed off on it? i mean, did Goebbels not sign off on it?
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>