Welcome to PatsFans.com

CBS' Jim Nantz: Herald's LIEgate story X-factor in Pats' SB loss?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by PonyExpress, May 15, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PonyExpress

    PonyExpress Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,658
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

  2. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,374
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +96 / 2 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    omg rly?? I'm pretty much shocked that it took this long for it to occur to anyone.
  3. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,460
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +283 / 0 / -3

    #75 Jersey

    God bless Nantz. But let's keep perspective here.

    He's the CBS guy who will be telecasting at least 4-6 times from a barcalounger in Bob Kraft's brand new CBS Scene at Gillette.

    That being said, after watching that a second time, he makes a very solid, fundamental point.
    Last edited: May 15, 2008
  4. chech1965

    chech1965 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    531
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  5. RhodyPatriot

    RhodyPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,411
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +12 / 12 / -5

    That Jim Nantz sticks out like a sore thumb doesn't he??
    Nantz is the 1 in the 100/1 anti-Patriot/pro-Patriot mediot ratio.
    It's a lonely job but somebody's gotta do it. :D Thanks Jim!
  6. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,460
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +283 / 0 / -3

    #75 Jersey

    I found the comparison to the Duke Lacrosse team very significant.

    By Sunday, will Arlen Specter be Mike Nifong?
  7. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,242
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +20 / 3 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    :rofl::rofl::rocker: Mike Nifong
  8. apple strudel

    apple strudel Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Except for the fact that, in spite of it all, we had that game won, until an amazing Giants drive and some extreme near misses (the Manning near sack/scramble!).

    I don't see the value in pinning that loss on external factors other than creating some weird lie to make us feel better about it.
  9. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 2 / -0

    Actually Jonathan Kraft made mention of this on WEEI today, saying that he felt that on the Saturday before the Super Bowl, the film and scouting staff had much better things to be doing than to be huddled with the Patriots brass and their lawyers confirming that they were not involved in the taping of the Rams walk through.

    Did that detract from their game preparation? I don't think anyone would assert it helped.
  10. apple strudel

    apple strudel Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    But isn't the game plan already in place by Saturday? Of course those resources might have picked something else up on film, but there's no guarantee. External locii of control are not the Patriots' way. :)
  11. mojocaster.com

    mojocaster.com Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Messages:
    624
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I sure as hell don't think it helped, and I sure as hell believe it had an impact. This said, I sure as hell don't believe that it was the reason why we lost that game. That game was lost on the field by an O-Line that couldn't stop the QB rush to save its life.
  12. PonyExpress

    PonyExpress Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,658
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    I disagree. I think the "lie" is that the Herald's story and subsequent firestorm had no effect on the outcome of the game. That lie makes some people better able to rationalize the outcome. Reality is much more uncomfortable.
  13. Bella*chick

    Bella*chick Addicted to the light

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    8,108
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    The material point here is that maybe one of the reasons everything looked so sloppy and out of focus was the distraction. Hence resulting in a lackluster, often confused-looking effort.

    The Patriots will never admit it because they just wouldn't stoop to that level. That's for crying whiners like the Chargers, et al. But do I believe it had an effect? Oh, HELL yes.
  14. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,460
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +283 / 0 / -3

    #75 Jersey

    I distinctly remember the morning of the SB, Senator Arlen Specter on live with Mike and Mike saying he was going to call Tom Brady into his committee later THAT WEEK to answer questions.

    THAT was the jump the shark moment.
  15. stcjones

    stcjones Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,647
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7 / -1

    #12 Jersey


    I agree....I think Kraft should sue the cryptkeeper!!!!!
  16. hambone1818

    hambone1818 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +8 / 3 / -0

    I will continue to say this: Bill Belichick almost never gets out-coached or outprepared. In the biggest game of the season, the team looked lost scheme-wise, and some terrible decisions were made. In addition, it appeared as though both sides of the ball got destroyed--without adjustment--for three full quarters.

    The story certainly didn't help, that much we know. Whether it hurt is debatable, but just remember that after the fact people were asking if the best coach in the business had suddenly lost his touch.
  17. patsfaninpa

    patsfaninpa Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,632
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +27 / 8 / -1

    There have been 4 big pre-game distractions in the last 20 years. The team that it happened to has lost all 4 games. The Pats are the only team where the distraction was fabricated.

    XXIII - Stanley Wilson smokin crack night before game. Bengals offense ineffective and lose.

    XXXIII - E.Robinson trying to get a little some some night before game. He plays horribly and
    Falcons get blown out.

    XXXVII - B.Robbins hits Tijuana. Forgets about game. Raiders play awful lose to Bucs.

    XLII - Pats spend last 3 days defending themselves to the world. Play worse game of the year and lose. Scored 37 pts on Giants field 1 month earlier. 14 on neutral field indoors.
  18. blackglass3

    blackglass3 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,782
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +20 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Yes, I remember that too. I also remember us speculating on if that threat would distract Brady. I imagine it did. :(

    Man, I don't ever want to relive that day again. From waking up and seeing the FLOOD of Walsh crap to this site crashing that night, it was just a bad day all over.
  19. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    37,692
    Likes Received:
    257
    Ratings:
    +476 / 2 / -10

    #87 Jersey


    Harsh but true ... how to cut your nose off to spite your face.
  20. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    What I got out of just watching the segment on NFLN was that Nance gets it, and it troubles and saddens him, and as he listened to him even Eisen looked uncomfortable. He was indicting the sports media. In their rush to gain a competitive advantage they are breaking all their own longstanding and well reasoned rules. Gee, the same thing they eviscerated BB for... Nance articulated something I was thinking earlier today, how the problem is compounded because as each one reports others feel compelled to immediately add layers based on that report. By the time you find out the original report was unfounded, it's too late to peel back those layers and put the proverbial genie back in the bottle. And potentially reputations if not lives are on some level irreparably damaged. He cited the Duke players as one example. And to what end, only so some mediot could be first and others could quickly add their two cents. He doesn't know what the answer is either because how can you enforce/police the rules short of endless slander and libel suits. Schefter seemed to be more willing to write it off to society as it is.

    I was listening to Felger late this afternoon, as he flip flopped around on the fence, and at one point I was so incensed because he was making a case that Walsh's story rang true because he got promoted to a scout after that Superbowl. Only that's not true. Pioli stated several weeks ago that Walsh's move out of the video department to scouting was a lateral move. He remained in an entry level position, just assigned to another department where instead of taping games and practices he was editing footing packages for college players actual scouts were following. They are lazy and careless. They report second hand information and can't even get that right because they are too consumed with getting their poorly reasoned snap judgement on the record so some other half baked mediot can reference it.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>