Welcome to PatsFans.com

Carucci on the role of Tight Ends and the draft

Discussion in 'Patriots Draft Talk' started by patchick, May 2, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,791
    Likes Received:
    399
    Ratings:
    +1,100 / 9 / -2

    #11 Jersey

    I just read this piece from Carucci on NFL.com:
    Increasing role of tight end reflected in 2010 NFL Draft

    The title is "Increasing role of tight end reflected in 2010 NFL Draft." He states that teams "clearly are having an increasing awareness" of the pivotal role of the position, and cites a key reason as "to better handle the pressure defenses are able to apply through creative blitzing."

    Yet the balance of the article shows that this draft simply had a bonanza of talent at the position, after several really crappy TE classes:


    If you ask most of the men who evaluate NFL talent, they will tell you that this was an exceptionally strong draft for tight ends. We're not just talking about the ones that only excel at catching passes and are, in reality, glorified wide receivers. We're talking about complete tight ends -- those capable of blocking as well as catching.
    ...
    Three teams (Baltimore, New England, and St. Louis) even picked two tight ends apiece. "Those clubs really took advantage of the draft," said Tampa Bay Buccaneers general manager Mark Dominik
    ...
    "In past drafts, over the past few years, there have hardly been any (true) tight ends," Rams general manager Billy Devaney said. "This was a great year to get 'dual guys,' that can run block a little bit and also contribute in the passing game."



    Best of all, Carucci compares the number of TEs drafted this year to 2005, to demonstrate the "trend." Why did he choose 2005? Take a look at the past decade:
    2001 15
    2002 23
    2003 13
    2004 16
    2005 9
    2006 16
    2007 13
    2008 16
    2009 20
    2010 19

    So the first 4 years of the decade averaged 17 TEs drafted, the last 4 averaged...17 TEs drafted. Wow, it's a revolution! :rolleyes:

    This was the best TE class in ages. IMO you can see that in the fact that the Pats were willing to enter this draft with a gaping hole at the position, something they almost never do. And IMO, that's the whole story about the 19 players selected. What do you think?
  2. PatsCanDoIt

    PatsCanDoIt Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Some of the commenters were discussing that. Carucci is trying to say that some teams look at Tony Gonzalez or Dallas Clark and decide they want a guy like that now. So more TEs were drafted. The truth is that it is hard to find a guy that can block, run, and catch. If you find a guy that can do two of those things your doing pretty well. I agree that depth was the key this year. A better way to prove the trend would be to look at TE receiving statistics. Not just receptions but targets as well.
  3. PatsFanStnfrd

    PatsFanStnfrd Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Carucci should have called his piece "Back to the Future".
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>