Welcome to PatsFans.com

Bush is totally to blame....

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by ELOrocks17, Jun 24, 2006.

  1. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    For keeping America safe from terrorism,

    Thank you Mr President...
  2. Turd Furguson

    Turd Furguson Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    USS Cole?

    Oklahoma City?

    Khobar Towers?
  3. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,866
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +562 / 2 / -9

    Does Clinton still carry his Bible?
  4. Mainefan

    Mainefan Rookie

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    What happens when the first suicide bomber kills himself and 20 Americans in front of the John Hanco*k building? Or in Rockefeller center. Will you then say Bush is to blame, ELORocks?
  5. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I doubt it. Here's an example.
    When reagan was president, we had a good economy, towards the end of 2nd. term, the stock market crashed with a 300 point loss, interest rates went up, home sales and construction crashed, buisness had massive layoffs, bankruptcy hit record levels, ect. ect. ect.

    Under bush I the market improved some, then went south into a recession with massive budget and national deficits.

    Clinton comes in tha economy slowly improves, and by 96 were in a boom and the deficits are being reduced .

    Who gets all the credit for the 90's, reagan. You know that when another terrorist attack happens in the usa, it will be clintons fault and no one else's. At least in some peoples partisan minds.
  6. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Technically, all US embassies no matter what country they are in is considered US soil. So when Terrorists bombed the US Embassy in East Africa in 1998, they bombed US soil.
  7. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    It is very telling that you said "when" instead of "If"..Are you planning something?
  8. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  9. scout

    scout Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,713
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 0 / -2

    #15 Jersey

    There are a couple of reasons why we haven't been hit with terrorists after 9/11. The terrorists typically take years to plot and execute their acts. Treasury Secretary O'Neil did a great job of shutting down the financial avenues of the terrorists. Shame he was fired. If you think the reason for us not being hit with another attack has to do with the Bush Administration of protecting us, your mistaken. The Department of Homeland Security is a spin machine which top level individuals are more concerned with how they are perceived then what they are doing to protect our country (see my thread on Homeland Insecurity). Didn't our Commander In Chief want to secure our ports by contracting with a United Arab Emirates-based company. Yea, him and Brownie are the gold dust twins.
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 3, 2005
  10. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,866
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +562 / 2 / -9

    Clinton Bombed a Chinese Embassy :singing: and a hospital :singing: and an aspirin factory :singing:

    Uncle Teddy is always Bombed :rocker:
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2006
  11. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Would you base what he did,on faulty intelligence??????
  12. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,866
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +562 / 2 / -9

    Gosh, I never thought of that, maybe Bush had faulty intelligence also (wmd's)
  13. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,563
    Likes Received:
    184
    Ratings:
    +438 / 10 / -11

    #24 Jersey

    WTC Attack #1 ?
  14. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Yes bush had faulty intelligence. And when it was found to be faulty, did he tell the american people it was? as each piece of evidence comes out, bush has been steadfast with saying otherwise until the heat became unbearable on certain aspects of his statements, as I have proved with links , that had a video of bush and cheney repeatedly saying for months after it was known not to be true..So in essence what the bush administration did, is go to war on faulty and trumped up cherry picked intelligence. And when it was known that parts of the intelligence was junk, the bush boys kept on repeating untrue facts, why is that ????????
  15. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    39,866
    Likes Received:
    176
    Ratings:
    +562 / 2 / -9

    I never knew that.
  16. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Is that how you operate in your life? I mean c'mon you toss a lot of unsubstantiated words on here, and when someone tells you here is links facts times dates ect. ect. ect.. Then you say I NEVER KNEW THAT, and five minutes later you repeat the same unsubstantiated tripe.
  17. PatsFanInEaglesLand

    PatsFanInEaglesLand Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    45
    Ratings:
    +91 / 7 / -13

    #37 Jersey

    Wow what a huge LIE that one was, what a bunch of no life losers, mediamatters is.

    Why don't you look up the facts mediamatters is actually the one who is lying in that smear piece, the only part Hannity got wrong was the 90% comment.

    Maybe you should lay off the propaganda, named mediamatters.org.
  18. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    If it's untrue, show us all, where hannity is not distorting each and every one of these issues brought up on this video.
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2006
  19. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    here's another one of hannity's facts being disputed, about reagan.
    Constantly distorting the facts is not is not reporting the facts , that's called agenda driven partisan news... I thought this decade was all about honesty and integrity to show who's who.
    http://mediamatters.org/items/200511220007
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2006
  20. Blue Collar

    Blue Collar Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    What about iran contra, where we traded weapons for hostages.
    Lebanon where a military base got bombed and we bailed.
    Explain to us what really happened, and link it with factual info.
    Until then, hannity is exsposed for what he is, a lying hack, and everyone knows it.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>