FredFromDartmouth
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2009
- Messages
- 3,315
- Reaction score
- 1,615
Can someone shed some light on this issue?
To my way of thinking, the loss of the draft picks is way, way more important than losing Brady for 4 games. Matt Cassel proved that the Patriots can do OK, not great, but OK, without Brady, and Jimmy G. is a much better QB than Cassel.
The Patriots have done very well with their first round picks, so this seems like a much more serious (and ridiculously over the top) punishment.
So why isn't the local media up in arms about the draft picks?
Can the Patriots even appeal the loss of draft picks?
To my way of thinking, the loss of the draft picks is way, way more important than losing Brady for 4 games. Matt Cassel proved that the Patriots can do OK, not great, but OK, without Brady, and Jimmy G. is a much better QB than Cassel.
The Patriots have done very well with their first round picks, so this seems like a much more serious (and ridiculously over the top) punishment.
So why isn't the local media up in arms about the draft picks?
Can the Patriots even appeal the loss of draft picks?