Iron Helmet
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2006
- Messages
- 256
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I hope you will pardon me if I think there is a possibility of 'life after Branch'. But I certainly wouldn't want to force you to drink kool-aid - that would be unkind.THEARCHIVES said:If the Pats don't get back Gabriel and Jackson and the Pats stop playing these injury "games" which is getting really old then say a prayer for Brady cause the O-Line stinks at pass blocking. Is Jackson going to play this season or not? Good luck finding an open reciever! If I were Brady I would be pissed at Patriots management. Jackson and Gabriel better get their ass on the field by week 2 and contribute! Enough with the bull**** with they don't know the playbook, they have been playing their whole lives. Did these recievers suddenly become illiterate? Patriots management sometimes irratates the **** out of me. I am happy the recieved a first round pick for Branch but that may fix the problem down the road when Tom Brady is in the hospital with Trent Green.
Ofcourse you can voice your opinion but you dont need 2 threads saying that Brady wont last the season and that the Patriots are doomed.THEARCHIVES said:If being a fan of the Pats for 10 years straight is bandwagon fan then I guess I am. I don't like anyother football team other then the Pats. Sorry I critize the Pats and voice my opinion. If the Pats kept Branch and Jackson actually gets on the field I thought this team would get back to the superbowl no problem. We will see who is right.
shmessy said:THEARCHIVES' thread title: "Re: Brady loses for now, good luck the rest of the way..... "
______________________
Good luck this year to your team, too!
THEARCHIVES said:I know it's the first game of the season and lots of teams are rusty coming out of the gates, but if the first game is any indication, Brady will have a hard time lasting the season.
arrellbee said:One think would make me happy though - could you explain to me what the WR issue has to do with the O-line blocking ? That is really puzzling me.
By the way, if I had to make a judgment - I think if the O-line gets it's act together (which seems like a no-brainer) then I really think that Brady will do just fine in the passing game, even without Branch. Or do you think he has lost the capability to find a lot of different receiving targets ? Maybe you know something the rest of us don't. Please enlighten.
Real World said:Brady has to be pissed. Let's face it fellas, I drink the Kool Aid as much as possible, but today, the Kood aid's tasting a little sour. For a team that is supposedly so sharp fiscally, I think they dropped the ball with both Givens and Branch. Why? Cuz they could have avoided loosing both, especially Givens, had they done what most prudent organizations do, and sign their player ahead of free agency. Givens & Branch are both mid 20's players. Young, understanding of the system, and ultimate team guys. Niether are old and declining. Had the Pats gone to Givens last year, they could have signed him cheap. Branch may have been a tad tougher to sign, but they certainly could have gotten him had they acted ahead of schedule.
arrellbee said:I hope you will pardon me if I think there is a possibility of 'life after Branch'. But I certainly wouldn't want to force you to drink kool-aid - that would be unkind.
One think would make me happy though - could you explain to me what the WR issue has to do with the O-line blocking ? That is really puzzling me.
By the way, if I had to make a judgment - I think if the O-line gets it's act together (which seems like a no-brainer) then I really think that Brady will do just fine in the passing game, even without Branch. Or do you think he has lost the capability to find a lot of different receiving targets ? Maybe you know something the rest of us don't. Please enlighten.
THEARCHIVES said:Yeah sure I don't get it! Because I'm critical of the Pats means I don't get it, right? Sorry I don't drink the kool-aid on a daily basis and my arguement is warranted. Brady had a great relationship with Branch and the fact of the matter is, is that the Pats organization is as arrogant as they come. This may be their downfall in time. We shall see.
Odlirama said:The bandwagon is getting less crowded.
Real World said:Brady has to be pissed. Let's face it fellas, I drink the Kool Aid as much as possible, but today, the Kood aid's tasting a little sour. For a team that is supposedly so sharp fiscally, I think they dropped the ball with both Givens and Branch. Why? Cuz they could have avoided loosing both, especially Givens, had they done what most prudent organizations do, and sign their player ahead of free agency. Givens & Branch are both mid 20's players. Young, understanding of the system, and ultimate team guys. Niether are old and declining. Had the Pats gone to Givens last year, they could have signed him cheap. Branch may have been a tad tougher to sign, but they certainly could have gotten him had they acted ahead of schedule.
shmessy, any chance you can merge a number of THE arcHIVES fine posts together (they're pretty much the same it seems) so folks can appreciate them all in one location?shmessy said:Arrellbee, THEARCHIVES never saw the game. He's probably some pimply teenager in Kentucky with a Fantasy Football League. He sees Brady's stat line yesterday and has no idea that 5 balls were batted down, etc.
Chances are, he never heard of a Left Tackle, not to mention the fact that ours was playing his first game back from a broken leg and the Bills DE's and LB's used him as a trampoline.
THEARCHIVES said:How the hell are you a moderator? You don't make any sense. Good luck this year to your team too. Who are you?
I love it! More room for everybody else.Ceresco said:Aint that the truth!
Brownfan80 said:Since Branch got traded you've posted at least two (maybe three, maybe more) doom and gloom, sky is falling type of posts. Nothing changed today except that we garnered a first round pick. Branch already wasn't playing. So him being gone is no different, he was never here! The sky isn't falling any more today than it was yesterday or the day before that.
Just simmer down and let it ride. People reacted the same when Drew was traded, when Milloy was cut, when Law was let go, etc etc etc. It'll be alright.
Odlirama said:ROTFLMAO.
Man! You need to call your doctor and schedule a visit right away. I think you have a bad case of foot in mouth disease.
Hoodie said:hmm. we went through 4 pre-season games and didn't have the pass protection problems we had yesterday, so maybe it had something to do specifically with the Bills. Therefore maybe it's something that can be corrected or maybe they were just flat or maybe it was an anomaly and it will never happen again.
Good God, how can people be SO reactionary?
THEARCHIVES said:Yeah sure I don't get it! Because I'm critical of the Pats means I don't get it, right? Sorry I don't drink the kool-aid on a daily basis and my arguement is warranted. Brady had a great relationship with Branch and the fact of the matter is, is that the Pats organization is as arrogant as they come. This may be their downfall in time. We shall see.