IllegalContact
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2010
- Messages
- 31,809
- Reaction score
- 16,273
Gholston never gave a damn. Watt is one of the top-5 highest character guys in the draft. What?
you know this how?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Gholston never gave a damn. Watt is one of the top-5 highest character guys in the draft. What?
Actually, I think Watt's length (nearly 6'5"+) may edge him a bit closer to BB's prototype DE than some of the other guys (based on the hypothesis that a guy can get heavier, but he can't get taller) and 290 lbs is probably close enough to 300 for now.
However, I think BB is looking for a DE who....
- has a a lot of tape over multiple seasons showing (with numerous examples), the ability to:
(1) cover gap assignments/hold the PoA well v. the run, frequently tying up multiple blockers
(2) shed, get pressure, make plays (including RB tackles) from several different DL positions
There may be a couple other prospects who are ahead of Watt on at least a couple of those qualifiers, if not all three. That, in combination with draft pick cost, would probably be the critical factors in Watt vs. NOT.
you know this how?
I'd like to think that BB is a little less pedantic. We have enough of those DE's already in Stroud & T&G Warren, and Brace
Last season we spend just over 50% of our time in 4 man fronts. I think what makes Watt so attractive is that aside from having the potential to grow into all this skills you mention for the 3-4. He also possesses the ability to rush the passer more effectively from the DE position than the others and the versatility to slide down/or out when the Pats go to their 2 and 4 DL configurations. He might even have the agility (at least VJ thinks he has) to stand up and rush the passer.
Your points are well made, but this might be the year to add some different DE skill to the mix.
However, I think BB is looking for a DE who....
- has a a lot of tape over multiple seasons showing (with numerous examples), the ability to:
(1) cover gap assignments/hold the PoA well v. the run, frequently tying up multiple blockers
(2) shed, get pressure, make plays (including RB tackles) from several different DL positions
Rex Ryan recently called Gholston a great athlete and very smart, but "phony." If you're athletic and smart and such that much, then something is wrong in the "self-motivation" area. He's also been called "soft" by many sources, which shows he wasn't really trying a whole lot on the football field.
Watt by all accounts has very high work ethic. He went to CMU for a year before walking on at Wisconsin. We won the Lott IMPACT Award last year. Academic All-Big 10 his last two years. He already has his own charity.
Both athletic. Both smart. The work ethic is why one has accomplished nothing and why the other is going to accomplish a lot, whether he's part of the Patriots or not.
You can't tell what a player will do at the top level once he is rich...he may still have that KILLER instinct and go to the HOF,or he may just be a rich lazy baztard that guys like Gholston are who never really cared if he was going to acheive stardom or not.
Not sure where this fascination comes from.. but he is not the Proto-Type guy we are looking for at DE.. He is Mike Wright 2.0.. that's not a bad thing but he is no #93 clone..
He is represented by Tom Condon .. strike two and his size is not ideal either..
What am I missing here folks?
How the hell do you know that Watt will become an all pro without playing a down in the NFL?
Some athletes look awesome in college but they are playing for ZERO $$$ at that time....once some of these guys become instant Multi-Millionaires overnight they get complacent and don't look anything like they did at the college level and fail in the pros because they don't have that killer instinct that got them to this level.
The draft has been,is,and will always be a crapshoot - you may get an overacheiver,a player that looks just like he did in college or may get a true DUD who once looked like a STUD in college
In your assessment there would rarely be a bust in the top 15 of drafts....I don't have a stats sheet but I would near guarantee you in the history of the NFL draft,there have been MANY more duds than studs in the top 20 of the first round.
You can't tell what a player will do at the top level once he is rich...he may still have that KILLER instinct and go to the HOF,or he may just be a rich lazy baztard that guys like Gholston are who never really cared if he was going to acheive stardom or not.
–adjective
1. ostentatious in one's learning.
2. overly concerned with minute details or formalisms, especially in teaching.
The draft is a crap shoot because there aren't enough guys with elite character AND elite ability. Watt is one. There might be one or two others in the whole draft.
Gholston never gave a damn. Watt is one of the top-5 highest character guys in the draft. What?
Yeah, he's pretty much exactly the prototype except that he needs a year to add bulk. No other DE is ready to start immediately, but Watt has the highest ceiling of all the guys that will be ready in a year.
I remember jays52 posting about how Wright and Watt are so different, but I don't know where that post is. I'll summarize though: The only thing they have in common is the color of their skin.
Not sure where this fascination comes from.. but he is not the Proto-Type guy we are looking for at DE.. He is Mike Wright 2.0.. that's not a bad thing but he is no #93 clone..
He is represented by Tom Condon .. strike two and his size is not ideal either.. What am I missing here folks?